There is already global parameters to do this. You can globally turn off cab modelling when you want to use the solid state amps and real cabs.Any chance of implementing Output Mode: "FRFR/SS PA + Cab" in the AX8?
Yes I can, but it's not the same as changig Output Mode in the amp Block.There is already global parameters to do this. You can globally turn off cab modelling when you want to use the solid state amps and real cabs.
Still on 10.0, using 1.9.0 edit. There's nothing that makes the unit unuseable live. Some pops here and there, preset change not as fast as I'd like, a weird click sound that only happens with my Parker guitar on a clean preset, etc. Minor stuff.
The only problem I've had sometimes is that I hit a preset and sound comes out "thin". I go down a preset, come back and it sounds full again. It's hard to reproduce and happens in rare ocassions, but I can't say but exactly I am doing when it happens. No time to take notes when playing live.
If the port is finally done I'll give it a go for sure
Hi, I have exactly the same problem from time to time with last firmware.
Yes I can, but it's not the same as changing Output Mode in the amp Block.
Setting output mode to SS PA + Cab does not disable cab modeling. It changes the way the Speaker compression Works.
From the Wiki:
"The default value, FRFR, is the classic mode and designed for use with monitors or recording. The SS PA + Cab mode is intended for use with a solid-state power amp and conventional guitar cab. In this mode speaker compression modeling behaves differently relying on the speaker for compression while still simulating the interaction with the power amp."
This was introduced in the Axe Fx III in Firmware 1.16. I'm just making a humble wish for it to be implemented in the AX8 as well
Yes, that was my point That's why i made a wish for it to be implemented in the AX8 in my earlier post.The wiki quote is from the Axe FX III and not the AX8, and the implementation is not the same. There is no SS PA cab setting mode in the AX8.
I would be surprised if they're even considering adding the full Ares platform to the AX8 but rather more aspects of it, adding to what was included in FW 10.0. The part of Ares that was introduced in FW 10 didn't seem to impact the CPU in my experience. Anyone who has updated to Ares 2.0 on the Axe II would have a better answer.What I'm wondering, since Ares is more processor intensive. I assume that presets, that are already running on current firmware and using allot of processor power will not run with Ares. So we have to re-visit some of our presets and touch them up a bit.
Not a big deal really, just a point of curiosity really. At least for me.
...fromThe processing power of an FM-3 is roughly the same as an AX-8.
I'm working on Ares 2.00 for the AX-8. It's difficult though since the processor isn't as powerful and I'm having difficulty getting the new algorithms to run in the allotted time. I've also been sick all week and only have enough strength to work a couple hours a day.
I'm working on Ares 2.00 for the AX-8. It's difficult though since the processor isn't as powerful and I'm having difficulty getting the new algorithms to run in the allotted time. I've also been sick all week and only have enough strength to work a couple hours a day.