BaronVonGrim
Power User
Then a 4th. That could put emphasis on any of the other 3.I would use it like my JP Boogie ... 3 channels of the same amp. Clean, rhythm, and lead.
Then a 4th. That could put emphasis on any of the other 3.I would use it like my JP Boogie ... 3 channels of the same amp. Clean, rhythm, and lead.
YES!Would you actually use three amp blocks in a preset if there were three blocks available?
You need to say Bypass to Mute and run in parallel.I have some presets where I use two amps in stereo but I don't switch between them. I have ran two amps in parallel but if you have one bypassed for one scene and then the other bypassed for the next you get a straight signal with no amp running with the other that sounds like a clean amp running with a a high gain amp. If I run them in series and switch between them with either bypassed states or even control switches I get thumps and pops between amps. So what is the best way to run more than one amp black and switching between them? I would love to do the the 3 amp block setup if it were smooth.
As the two currently available amp blocks exist on their own processor
I don't recall ever seeing that confirmed for the Axe Fx III...
Yeah... I know the Axe Fx II was that way, and the III might be, too. Just never seen it officially mentioned.I see. I assumed it's this way because the CPU usage increases only very slightly when the Amp blocks are added to the grid.
More is, well....MORE! I vote yes!
Would you actually use three amp blocks in a preset if there were three blocks available?
My guitar player and I are working on bumping down to a single III for our entire setup. Three blocks would be very helpful for us so we could double up the guitar amps alongside a single bass amp.