You would need to put in 2 separate effects chains (at least where you split the cab out). A lot of times you can place the effects before the cab (unless the are not linear time invarient - drives, compressors, amps, and such) and it won't matter. Otherwise you would need to recreate the post cab effects and route to output 2.
From Cliff:
http://forum.fractalaudio.com/showthread.php?t=35997&p=490445&viewfull=1#post490445
The Axe-fx II is the sound card
I appreciate the information. According to you, With the AXE II may be dispensed with an external sound card, as well as other BP Unit Eleven or pod, of course with the quality of fractal.
It is not very clear to me the information I have.
It has 3 input channels, one for reampling Dry explains how to reampling, it is very easy. But I have not read a Cliff or anyone responsible for explaining how routing works. 3 signals out of the Axe, but .... while two others come to hear the master of the DAW?
It is a very interesting topic for home studio as you avoid the payment of a sound card, as with the original AXE.
Can anyone give more information?
Thanks in advance
Ok, just got back to reading more info here .. looked in the collective Q&A section, could find this specifically ...
If I use the X/Y feature on one button, and have two amps and several effects setup, I could actually keep eveything on all the time and decide what to use in either the X or Y depending on the mix control ... correct?
So I don't need any on/off buttons assigned to anything, I just need to turn the mix off of any effect I don't want in either X or Y.
So Amp 1 is 100 mix% and Amp 2 is 0% in X, and the reverse is true in Y. Switching between X and Y basically turns on those amps or effects.
Is this correct? Any downfall to always having the effects on and the mix to 0 ... does this downgrade the signal at all?
the way I understand it:
one CC controller is needed for block ON/OFF (bypass)
another CC controller is needed for X/Y selection
Concerning the revised looper, is there any way to store loops?
How do the TigerSHARC DSPs compare in performance to the various ARM processors that are in smartphones and tablets now? I would assume that the DSP's must be significantly better at handling signal processing but not sure how far the ARM processors have come with various multimedia extensions on board.
Any insight for the curious?
Would you recommend not to use a wireless to benefit from the impedance feature?
Or will it still have a noticable influence on these signals?
Bernd