TBH, it's really hard for me to judge how important this would be for me without hearing direct comparisons, or ideally, playing through both.I personally would welcome this as a solution. No whining, just the opinion of someone who doesn't use a lot third party IRs and and would love to have the FullRes functionality.
No, the feeling of feedback is in the modeling software itself.Wow, Guess you're pushing your headphones to the limit if you start to feedback.
I do, but my attitude towards progress remains as I stated. Going on 9 months now. And I happened to buy in at a good time in the development cycle, but I wasn't the least bit concerned about it either.I m joking /trolling most of the time , I don’t have tried everything yet on the unit and I use it daily . I know it’s already a huge piece of gear even if everything stops now. But yeah one year after . … you own one since a few month if I m not wrong, maybe you understand a little bit what I mean .
I am that guyI do, but my attitude towards progress remains as I stated. Going on 9 months now. And I happened to buy in at a good time in the development cycle, but I wasn't the least bit concerned about it either.
I'm just thrilled at what it can do, and as I've stated elsewhere, if it never received another update, I wouldn't care. It would take something absolutely massive for me to want to upgrade. I've proven that to myself in that I keep things a long long time before I buy something to replace them.
We have definitely become a society that feels they need the latest/greatest new gizmo. I'm not that guy. (Costs too much damn money.)
At a wild guess FFT, or fast fourier transform, taking the time based data into the frequency/phase domain (and vice versa) with much higher efficiency than a "simple" full fat fourier transform. It's pretty much the basis of IR technology, and much more mathematically sound than most data compression techniques.But I thought UltraRes IR's are 8K samples or about 170 ms long. Is there some kind of file compression or other trickery that allows for all that extra sample data to be stored in the same slots as 2K long IRs? Ancient Chinese secret perhaps?
It’s normal to be hyped with new products . When it’s your passion ... buying gear makes me happy and kept the doctor away .I am that guy
The only possibility would be to change the User 2 bank to a User FR bank. So you would give up 1024 User IR slots in exchange for 32 FullRes user slots.
The only possibility would be to change the User 2 bank to a User FR bank. So you would give up 1024 User IR slots in exchange for 32 FullRes user slots.
Why aren't you?How are you folks SO enthusiastic about this new format you've barely heard and haber never played through?
Shiny shiny?
So let it be written....That would be a nightmare. It would break the factory presets and many of the user's presets.
The only possibility would be to change the User 2 bank to a User FR bank. So you would give up 1024 User IR slots in exchange for 32 FullRes user slots.