Steven Persson
Inspired
The headroom meter on the first tab in the amp block can visually help out a bit to where the sweet spot is.
Yep, that's why it was added!The headroom meter on the first tab in the amp block can visually help out a bit to where the sweet spot is.

Sorry but I'm very stupid!The headroom meter on the first tab in the amp block can visually help out a bit to where the sweet spot is.
It's at the bottom of the Amp block on the Tone page.Sorry but I'm very stupid!
Where can I find it? - What name specifically!
"AMP BLOCK CAN Visually Help Out a Bit to WHERE The Sweet Spot Is"
Thanks!
Thank you!It's at the bottom of the Amp block on the Tone page.
Thank you!
To your first question, yes, pretty much.If the headroom meter doesn't go to 0db does that mean that there is no power amp distortion?
I am so clueless when it comes to power amp distortion as the only tubez amp I've ever owned was a MesaBoogie that never had the MV past 2. Could someone point me to a preset that is all about power amp dist?

I also recommend this YT clip from Pete Thorn. I disagree with him on a few things, he's a member of "high voltage needed to get great tone" school of thought, whereas I am a member of "digital can get arbitrarily (epsilon?) close to the real thing depending on compute power and algorithm" school. Still I think he does a great job illustrating the power and preamp distortion difference in this one.If the headroom meter doesn't go to 0db does that mean that there is no power amp distortion?
I am so clueless when it comes to power amp distortion as the only tubez amp I've ever owned was a MesaBoogie that never had the MV past 2. Could someone point me to a preset that is all about power amp dist?
I also recommend this YT clip from Pete Thorn. I disagree with him on a few things, he's a member of "high voltage needed to get great tone" school of thought, whereas I am a member of "digital can get arbitrarily (epsilon?) close to the real thing depending on compute power and algorithm" school. Still I think he does a great job illustrating the power and preamp distortion difference in this one.
I don’t remember hearing that from Pete, that would surprise me. At which part of the clip does he call 800 a preamp-based amp?Really helpful posts! Thank you so much. One thing that I found interesting is that Pete is categorizing the JCM800 as a "preamp distortion" amp along with Mesa, ENGL, Soldano, etc. and yet, from Yek's amp guide JCM800 entry:
“Those amps are all designed to get their character from power amp distortion. If you
don't push the power amp all you are hearing is the preamp which is voiced to be trebly.
The power amp then compresses the highs and the sound gets fatter.”
Starts around 1:20I don’t remember hearing that from Pete, that would surprise me. At which part of the clip does he call 800 a preamp-based amp?
I see. He's just pointing out the fact that "even" JCM800 sounds good at lower volumes because it has a master volume and relies heavily on Pre-amp distortion. That statement is correct, but JCM800 at low volumes sound nothing like when it is cranked up and cooking.Starts around 1:20
And a Tubescreamer!A JCM800 sounds best when it is getting its distortion from a combination of preamp and power amp distortion.

I had a JCM800 that for some inexplicable reason was manufactured with 6550s. The power amp would never distort. I tried putting a booster in the effects loop, and all it did was clip the effects return. It sounded like shit at any volume, even with a power soak. I absolutely hated that amp. Then I heard one with EL34s, and it dawned on me why everyone else didn't hate them too.
...but JCM800 at low volumes sound nothing like when it is cranked up and cooking.