1. We would like to remind our members that this is a privately owned, run and supported forum. You are here at the invitation and discretion of the owners. As such, rules and standards of conduct will be applied that help keep this forum functioning as the owners desire. These include, but are not limited to, removing content and even access to the forum.

    Please give yourself a refresher on the forum rules you agreed to follow when you signed up.
    Dismiss Notice

Dual Recto with the LB-2 vs the Axe-Fx III and more

Discussion in 'Axe-Fx III Recordings' started by Guitarjon, Oct 11, 2018.

  1. merlin17

    merlin17
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,129
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Neuwied, Germany
    What about my impression of the "lost notes"? That's more about clarity in the gain structure. The frequency response differences are not that much bothering me, because that can be corrected relatively easy...
     
  2. Guitarjon

    Guitarjon
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,952
    Likes Received:
    4,177
    Can you explain a bit further what you mean?
     
  3. merlin17

    merlin17
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,129
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Neuwied, Germany
    In your last comparison where you play the chords (13:38) I'm hearing the notes of the chords clearly in the Recto recordings, in all the modelers I mainly hear the fizz and the notes disappear. In the Recto it sounds similar to a Tube Screamer where there's a clean attack in parallel with the distortion, that clean attack is missing in the modelers.
     
    Guitarjon likes this.
  4. ML SOUND LAB

    ML SOUND LAB
    Expand Collapse
    Cab Pack Wizard

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    8,519
    Likes Received:
    12,657
    I had to test out the master volume setting so I used Jon's settings and ran a test raising the master volume in 0.5 increments and then volume balancing and match EQ measuring the differences. Here's a clip with the master on 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and finally 4.0.



    Essentially between 0.5-2.0 there's no real difference. Getting a flat line in my comparison but from that point on at 3.0 you have 1dB less high end. On 4.0 you have like 3dB less high end. Here's a picture of 1.0 vs 4.0:

    [​IMG]

    So the conclusion would be that the master setting didn't affect the brightness of the amp sim since Jon had it on 2.0 which was the default setting that was IMO the sweet spot as well and raising it up made the sound darker and it didn't get brighter when lowering it.
     
  5. yyz67

    yyz67
    Expand Collapse
    Inspired

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Portland OR
    Agree with the relative lack of clarity/treble in the modelers in the A/B comparison at the end.

    It's really clear for me and my hearing stops at 10kHz so it starts in the low treble for sure. Seems more than a few dB, more like a systematic roll-off of high freqs in the modelers (or bump in the actual amp).
     
    Guitarjon likes this.
  6. Guitarjon

    Guitarjon
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,952
    Likes Received:
    4,177
    I assure you guys that there weren't any hi-cuts or filters used throughout this entire video.
    The DI tracks were all recorded with my axe fx as well as the signal of the amp.
    You can see in the video that I tried to match the controls.

    Sure, I could have spent a little more time to get them to sound even closer and likely even more so with the tonematch block.
    However, I didn't want to use any form of post processing for this video because that will get all the platforms closer to the real amp and that would make it harder for people to really hear the differences between all the different platforms.
    The Axe Fx III sounded close enough to me, especially in comparison to some of the other platforms cough*bias*cough.
     
    ML SOUND LAB likes this.
  7. ML SOUND LAB

    ML SOUND LAB
    Expand Collapse
    Cab Pack Wizard

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    8,519
    Likes Received:
    12,657
    I thought the comparison was done correctly. Tone match / advanced settings is quite a deep level of tweaking. I think the majority wants to see this kind of a direct head to head comparison. The good news for this community is that the Axe-Fx was definitely the closest modeler.
     
  8. Texhex

    Texhex
    Expand Collapse
    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2018
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    114
    At 13:39 it sounds like you are really pumped and in a groove while playing the Mesa. Also the A/B switches tend to favor the harmonics in the actual song chord progression to where the Mesa parts sound more articulate. I would wager that when you were playing the physical amp you were pretty stoked and rocking it hard :D
     
  9. FractalAudio

    FractalAudio
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Fractal Audio Systems Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    12,930
    Likes Received:
    85,437
    I disagree. I didn't do any tone match or advanced tweaks and my comparison (first two clips on the previous page) did not exhibit the same high end loss as the video. I used the exact same signal chain: amp-> LB-2 -> Axe-Fx III as IR player.
     
  10. ML SOUND LAB

    ML SOUND LAB
    Expand Collapse
    Cab Pack Wizard

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    8,519
    Likes Received:
    12,657
    When we're talking about "brighter and darker" I think we first need to get the facts straight. This is a match EQ of the real Recto vs Axe-Fx III:

    [​IMG]

    ... as in, this is how you would have to EQ the Axe-Fx III to match Jon's Recto. This would be the tone match curve. So the real amp is brighter at 10khz by about 2dB but the Axe-Fx is actually the one that has less low end since it would need a 5,6dB boost at 70hz and 1.5dB in the low mids. Depending on what you're using for listening you might not hear that low end especially since it's been high passed quite a bit. On the later comparisons it seemed as if the Axe-Fx had less highs but I think there were volume differences in favor of the Dual Recto at times.

    The way I would solve this would be to change the speaker page settings quite drastically and that's a real difference of this comparison. Loadbox vs the speaker simulation settings on the speaker page. This is usually where I need to make changes when comparing to my real amps as well. And I'm not only talking about loadbox comparisons. DI between amp and cab, same thing. Slave out of a Mesa plugged into a cab, same thing happens.

    Here's my real Mark V compared to the Axe-Fx III with a lot of fine tuning on the speaker page of the amp sim:


    It's not perfect especially in the low end but it's really close.
     
  11. BillyZeppa

    BillyZeppa
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,173
    Likes Received:
    410
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    Since there are plenty of clips and videos where it's near impossible to tell tube amp from AFX, so my first guess would be that all the AFXIII needs is a minor tweak - or the Recto needs a minor tweaking to match the modellers... :)
     
  12. ML SOUND LAB

    ML SOUND LAB
    Expand Collapse
    Cab Pack Wizard

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    8,519
    Likes Received:
    12,657
    The low end is different on the Loadbox vs the speaker page on the Axe-Fx III. That's the difference.
     
    BillyZeppa likes this.
  13. DLC86

    DLC86
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,546
    Likes Received:
    1,353
    Location:
    Sicilia - Italia
    If someone is interested in making deeper adjustments, here's a free software that, among a lot of other stuff, allows to measure the impedance curve of a speaker just by using an audio interface and a resistor.

    http://www.roomeqwizard.com

    Its help section explains clearly how to do it.
    Never tried it so I don't know how accurate this method is, certainly worth a try.
     
    GotMetalBoy likes this.
  14. FractalAudio

    FractalAudio
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Fractal Audio Systems Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    12,930
    Likes Received:
    85,437
    "Drastic settings" are not required. What is required is an understanding of the controls on that page and what they do. The LB-2 is roughly equivalent to a LF Res. Frequency of 100 Hz, Q of 1.6 and LF Resonance of 4.0. With the voicing switch in the US position the frequency changes to about 70 and the resonance increases to about 5. Due to tolerances the frequency can vary +/- 10%.

    So based on the above I'd say the LF resonant frequency is too high. The LB-2 was probably in the US voicing. A typical Recto cabinet has a resonant frequency a little over 100 Hz and therefore that is the default on the model.
     
    ML SOUND LAB and Guitarjon like this.
  15. GotMetalBoy

    GotMetalBoy
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,529
    Likes Received:
    930
    Location:
    Rochester, NY 14609
    I use that program to plot frequency responses. It seems to be very consistent. It also lets you export the frequency response as a CSV file, so it can be used in a spreadsheet to make Scatter charts.


    Regarding @Guitarjon comparisons, I wish the end section of the solo recordings played the entire chord riff through each modeler because the chords you play through the real amp are bigger chords with higher notes and the regular power chords and sus2 chord are played through the modelers. It gives a false perception that the real amp is clearer but it's really because you're playing almost 3 octaves.
     
    DLC86, zenaxe and Texhex like this.
  16. Texhex

    Texhex
    Expand Collapse
    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2018
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    114
    This exactly what I was saying and that it sounded like he was really into the real amp.
     
  17. 2112

    2112
    Expand Collapse
    Fractal Fanatic

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,596
    Likes Received:
    10,142
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Knowing this has made doing amp matches so much easier.
     
  18. Guitarjon

    Guitarjon
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,952
    Likes Received:
    4,177
    I have it set on UK always.
     
    ML SOUND LAB likes this.
  19. DLC86

    DLC86
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,546
    Likes Received:
    1,353
    Location:
    Sicilia - Italia
    So it should be already in the ballpark.
    Was speaker comp turned up in your preset perhaps? I think that can change the frequency response too, while a loadbox shouldn't have any compression.. maybe
     
  20. Guitarjon

    Guitarjon
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,952
    Likes Received:
    4,177
    The speaker comp was set to the default setting.
    I just compared the default settings of 2 to 0 and I didn't notice a real difference in the top end.
    I hardly ever use any settings other than the basic amp controls to be honest.
     
    ML SOUND LAB and DLC86 like this.

Share This Page