la szum
Axe-Master
Thank you for illustrating my point so perfectly.
Haha! Dig a hole and some people jump in and celebrate with a "This is what I do!!"
Thank you for illustrating my point so perfectly.
If you are full mono, one signal to the desk is fine.I have a quick stupid question .don’t want to open a topic for that …
If your chain is full mono , that’s not a problem to go just with one xlr or one jack in the mixing desk ? No need to put L and R we are ok ?
The sound is just a little louder when I put 2 jacks / xlr but that’s all . This is something since the beginning that I wonder …
I have a quick stupid question .don’t want to open a topic for that …
If your chain is full mono , that’s not a problem to go just with one xlr or one jack in the mixing desk ? No need to put L and R we are ok ?
The sound is just a little louder when I put 2 jacks / xlr but that’s all . This is something since the beginning that I wonder …
Just out of curiosity, has anyone used the new cab feature yet? I have seen a lot of people up in arms about this but haven't seen a good example as to why. I thought the examples Cliff gave sounded cool but to see this amount of "what about me", I would like to see it in application....not doubting its a big deal, but maybe not a big enough deal to start selling off gear or feeling left out about.
You may be right, but please remember that on the Axe FX II, there were multiple versions of the firmware released at the same time because of difference in hardware between II, IIXL and IIXL+.Splitting firmware into multiple current versions is a support nightmare, and an end-user issue as well. I doubt we’ll ever see that, and rarely see it in any other gear.
I would think high profile clients already have the MKII or can certainly afford one. I hope the full res IRs make it to the MK I so I can try them out but there is no way I am going to buy a MK II to try them out. Not going to happen!, but a few high profile clients needing the full IR library. Then what? That's a decision for the boss and we can all conjecture and guess. But in the end, CC will make the call on this.
Only the developers of FAS can recognize and measure how much effort it takes to implement the ideas.You may be right, but please remember that on the Axe FX II, there were multiple versions of the firmware released at the same time because of difference in hardware between II, IIXL and IIXL+.
None of the not-FAS staff actually know how much work it would be or not, or whether it would be needed or not.
I can image the case in which 90% of the Mk1 owners want FullRes (as the poll seems to indicate) which represents a vast majority which Cliff referred too in an earlier post, but a few high profile clients needing the full IR library. Then what? That's a decision for the boss and we can all conjecture and guess. But in the end, CC will make the call on this.
Personally, I use about 20 IRs total. So I can easily say goodbye to User bank 2. I am curious to see how this develops.
Please let me add a note that further consideration is necessary to determine if we can say "vast majority" of MK1 owners want FullRes based on the poll, as the questions remain in the poll's representativeness - no matter how many polls it would get, the poll cannot cover those who don't read/understand the poll or this forum itself (due to time constraints, language barriers for some international owners, and other whatever reasons), and it cannot assure that the poller's composition reflects actual customer base of MK1 owners.You may be right, but please remember that on the Axe FX II, there were multiple versions of the firmware released at the same time because of difference in hardware between II, IIXL and IIXL+.
None of the not-FAS staff actually know how much work it would be or not, or whether it would be needed or not.
I can image the case in which 90% of the Mk1 owners want FullRes (as the poll seems to indicate) which represents a vast majority which Cliff referred too in an earlier post, but a few high profile clients needing the full IR library. Then what? That's a decision for the boss and we can all conjecture and guess. But in the end, CC will make the call on this.
Personally, I use about 20 IRs total. So I can easily say goodbye to User bank 2. I am curious to see how this develops.
Really. Add some room ambience and be done with it.Wow. First public beta and already defeated! Why don;t you let this run it's course before you decide you've lost out!
Obviously, that's not what this is. If it was, Fractal wouldn't be bothering with it.Really. Add some room ambience and be done with it.
finally you did this Mud ! happy, for youI have tried the axe in the return of the head and my cab for the first time (wow it’s raining) and I m really impressed how the preamps are great . I understand why many people play with a cab. Sound really like a head . Really impressed.
The differences between the amps are not huge having the same cab and poweramp for them all, everything sound “the same” in a way, but it’s fun .
And once again … the afd sound completely off compared to all the others heads . I say this since the beginning but no way this head sound like this . Testing only the preamp with the cab is another proof.
If fractal can check this amp one day .
hats down for your product . Simulation is clearly in another planet with the axe
The differences between the amps are not huge having the same cab and poweramp for them all, everything sound “the same” in a way, but it’s fun .
AFAIK, when paired with real cab, people usually tend to favor to set speaker impendance curve to resistive load, so the sound is not overhyped in highs and lows.I wonder if it would be more pronounced of a difference if you dialed in the speaker impedance curve to match your cabinet. You may already have done that, but that is such an unbelievably powerful page of parameters, it feels like you'd miss so much without it really tweaked to your cab.
Nope, it depends on the type of power amp you're using.AFAIK, when paired with real cab, people usually tend to favor to set speaker impendance curve to resistive load, so the sound is not overhyped in highs and lows.