Axe-Fx III Firmware 22.01 Release

[bread]

I'm not sure if this is a bug or not (I suspect it is).

If you put a Multi Tap block (or stereo delay block) in parallel with the signal chain and bypass it, when you look at the block through the "Meters" page on the Axe FX3 only one channel has signal going through it. When the block is activated, both channels have signal passing through it.

I have my parallel blocks bypass mode set to "Mute In" so I don't think this would be a problem, but where Mute FX is used it could be.

Just checking in case its a problem.

 

[brianv4]

Apparently, Fender is going to be remaking them!

in limited numbers and expensive

 

[Rex]

I'm not sure if this is a bug or not (I suspect it is).

If you put a Multi Tap block (or stereo delay block) in parallel with the signal chain and bypass it, when you look at the block through the "Meters" page on the Axe FX3 only one channel has signal going through it. When the block is activated, both channels have signal passing through it.

I have my parallel blocks bypass mode set to "Mute In" so I don't think this would be a problem, but where Mute FX is used it could be.

Just checking in case its a problem.

Make sure you’re interpreting the meters correctly.

Each block has four meters — a stereo pair of ins and a stereo pair of outs. Could it be that you’re seeing the inputs move but not the outputs?

 

[Saarang Narayan]

in limited numbers and expensive

The guys who’ve re-started Sunn mentioned in a podcast that they were going to diversify the line in the years to come and have solid state and lower wattage options at more affordable prices. When exactly that would happen is of course a matter of speculation.

 

[bread]

Make sure you’re interpreting the meters correctly.

Each block has four meters — a stereo pair of ins and a stereo pair of outs. Could it be that you’re seeing the inputs move but not the outputs?

I'm not sure to be honest, Rex but if the block is bypassed the inputs or outputs should be the same as the activated states shouldn't they ? Other blocks display both left and right in bypass mode.

 

[Rex]

I'm not sure to be honest, Rex...

It would pay to find out.

..but if the block is bypassed the inputs or outputs should be the same as the activated states shouldn't they ?

If inputs and outputs stayed the same whether active or bypassed, there would be no point in bypassing. You have Bypass Mode st to Mute In. That will result in no output from the block, once the delay trails have ended.

Other blocks display both left and right in bypass mode.

Let's get back to basics. Do you see two meters or four in each block?

 

[unix-guy]

Let's get back to basics. Do you see two meters or four in each block?

@bread - to clarify, use colors: 2 meters are green and 2 are blue.

One pair is L/R input and one pair is L/R output.

Each pair can appear as a single meter if you're not aware or not paying close attention. That confused me in the past.

 

[bread]

@bread - to clarify, use colors: 2 meters are green and 2 are blue.

One pair is L/R input and one pair is L/R output.

Each pair can appear as a single meter if you're not aware or not paying close attention. That confused me in the past.

Right ... that might be what it is then. I only see one bar when bypassed but 2 bars when the block is activated. I didn't realise they were single meters.

Thank you for helping

 

[bread]

It would pay to find out.


IF inputs and outputs stayed the same whether active or bypassed, there would be no point in bypassing. You have Bypass Mode st to Mute In. That will result in no output from the block, once the delay trails have ended.


Let's get back to basics. Do you see two meters or four in each block?

Hi Rex I think @unix-guy answered my question as well. I think the single bar represents a L+R signal as the input (stereo) and the reason the second bar isn't present is because the bypass mode is to mute in.

I thought the two bars were for a single left and right channel not each one being a pair of left and rights - one pair for input the other pair for output.

Thanks for your help though it's always appreciated when you take the time to help.

 

[Vincenzo]

https://www.fractalaudio.com/downloads/firmware-presets/axe-fx-3/22p0/axefxiii_dsp_rel_22p01.zip

Adds Revv Gen Green amp models.

If you have already installed 22.00 and the Dyna-Cabs you do NOT need to reinstall the Dyna-Cab data.

Hello, it would be nice with the next firmware if there was the white color to illuminate the AX FX III writing in the unit in addition to the various colors available

 

[Shahar]

Hello, it would be nice with the next firmware if there was the white color to illuminate the AX FX III writing in the unit in addition to the various colors available

I was just thinking, it would also be cool if we can set the color from the scenes. Imagine Green for Clean, Blue for Crunch, Red for Lead, etc.

 

[Rex]

I think the single bar represents a L+R signal as the input (stereo) and the reason the second bar isn't present is because the bypass mode is to mute in.

Right. But put on your glasses. That single bar isn’t a single bar — it’s two bars showing the left and right channels. There are a total of four bars in each block.

 

[Shahar]

I was just thinking, it would also be cool if we can set the color from the scenes. Imagine Green for Clean, Blue for Crunch, Red for Lead, etc.

Looks like someone beat me to it
https://forum.fractalaudio.com/threads/custom-axefx-logo-color-per-scene.177160/

Let‘s get some +1‘s going…

 

[bread]

Right. But put on your glasses. That single bar isn’t a single bar — it’s two bars showing the left and right channels. There are a total of four bars in each block.

Right ....

Thanks

 

[Bulldog50]

No criticism implied, but are we done with AXE FX III firmware updates? Nothing in 2 months, which, historically, is a long time between updates. Should we be looking for the AXE FX IV?

 

[Rex]

No criticism implied, but are we done with AXE FX III firmware updates? Nothing in 2 months, which, historically, is a long time between updates. Should we be looking for the AXE FX IV?

I think you’re reading too much into this. DynaCabs is a huge step forward, and it took a ton of development work. It came to the Axe-Fx III first, and then was brought to the FM9 and FM3. Let the folks breathe for a minute.

 

[Randalljax]

I think you’re reading too much into this. DynaCabs is a huge step forward, and it took a ton of development work. It came to the Axe-Fx III first, and then was brought to the FM9 and FM3. Let the folks breathe for a minute.

I think the truth is Cliff is still trying to cancel his subscription to Sirius FM

 

[rhummellh]

I think the truth is Cliff is still trying to cancel his subscription to Sirius FM

Now I don't care who you are that's fuckin funny!!!

 

[REDD]

[/QUOTE]

I think you’re reading too much into this. DynaCabs is a huge step forward, and it took a ton of development work. It came to the Axe-Fx III first, and then was brought to the FM9 and FM3. Let the folks breathe for a minute.

It wouldn't hurt me any if we didn't have one for a bit. Everything is so good right now!
I wouldn't mind a new amp once in awhile or a couple new Dyna-cabs but that's it.

 

[State of Epicicity]

I do believe there was a hint that third party Dyna Cabs are in private beta, but I can't remember for sure. If that is the case, maybe it takes a lot to work out how best to implement them. Pure unadulterated conjecture based on shaky memory.