I remember seeing this but …
Past the topic of FullRes IRs,
but a completely new form of "Tonewood": https://versoinstruments.com/en/pickups/.
I remember seeing this but …
The space to store them still needs to be allocated. You don’t just drop them into an existing slot.Sorry, I didn't word that well at all. My thought was that the FullRes Ir's that are being discussed would be handled like any other user IR that one would purchase. Yes, you would be responsible for the space necessary in your user IR allocation to store and use them.
Cliff has already stated that the only viable solution is to reconvert User Bank II to accommodate these new IRI’ve probably already forgotten some of the suggestions in this thread, and I may have missed some others as well, so leading with a “my bad” before my suggestion. As I was reading about related issues for the memory requirements for the new IRs, I wonder if we could carve out a bit, by eliminating 5-10 User preset holding slots on the Mark 1 units, and uittiize that memory for 10 or 20 of the new IRs? I believe I read that two of the new type IRs use the same memory as one preset slot. I know there would still be enough preset slots for anything I do, even with a few less. I had not noticed anyone discussing the possibility, even though what I read made it sound like this could be an apples-to-apples memory comparison of size and type, which I know doesn’t validate that the User preset storage in the AF3 and space for the new IRs (in the AF3) would/could 100% be used for either/both. If I didn’t misread or misremember, perhaps this is yet another of the few options with which we might find some space to include the AF3 mk1 units. And in full disclosure, I have two AF3 Mark1 units, and one Mark 2 AF3.
cheers,
Lee
Personally I prefer to maintain all user cab slot in ultrares. I have a very large library of my personal IRs that I prefer. For “amp in the room” simulation personally I don’t use it beacouse when I add a Reverb Block it makes little sense. In live-contest The “Amp in the room” is real and natural of the ambient where I play and very rarely I use reverbs in live.Would it make sense to start a poll in this thread,
what the majority of Axe FX III MK I users think about the issue of not having a full bank of user IRs for 32 FullRes IRs?
I know Cliff already said the only way is to get rid of 1024 user IR slots, so just spitballing here, but now that I think about it wouldn’t it be cool if we could just get rid of enough user slots to load only 2 fullres IRs at a time…….boom……best of both worlds.
Fair enough.Cliff has already stated that the only viable solution is to reconvert User Bank II to accommodate these new IR
really hoped this could be implemented in an optional way
right... but I'd be surprised if the audience didn't insist, and given that insistence I'd me more surprised if cliff let them down (never really has yet)... so I'm assuming it's a foregone conclusion at this point.i think it's only a hypothetical optional for the mk1
I'm fine with that. It requires more curation of the IR's outside the user slots, but I don't use 1024 IR's, personally. It's hard to imagine keeping track of that many, realistically. I'll happily sacrifice the second set of 1024 for a set of 32 items that get me closer to what I want to hear out of my rig through my IEM's in particular.Looks like it’s all of user 2, or it’s not gonna happen. I was joking with my ‘suggestion’ but from what I understand that’s the choice and it has to be that for everyone, it can’t be optional.