Jason Scott
Fractal Fanatic
The presets are 'backward compatible' with the AxeFx also regardless of whether that feature is there. They will still load and will very likely be transparently improved.
It's been clarified on multiple occasions what was meant by backwards compatible within the context of presets, though I think the term forward compatible is more apropos. Specifically, while a preset will, in fact, function, the lack of continuity in maintaining the integrity of the sound is a compatibility issue. However, I'd be glad to adopt the term preset continuity. It makes no difference to me as long as we're on the same page.
I doubt any of the other cited products, if they were to improve their core modeling algorithms at all, would offer any guarantee that the old stuff sounded the same if the improvement was making an audible difference in newly created presets with the same model. Fact is, Fractal is the only company where this is a major issue because they constantly and aggressively improve their core algorithms.
I never claimed that changing the core modeling of those units wouldn't beget the same issue, but that they don't currently suffer from said issue after upgrading. As such, preset continuity is the accepted norm and generally expected. In fact, I've heard it used as a criticism leveled at the Axe on other forums.
IMHO, expecting to move forward in fundamental processes (like say how preamp tubes a re modeled) and expecting presets to NOT also sound different is unreasonable.
The issue has undoubtedly already been resolved. At this point the issue is whether the functionality remains in order to extend the upgrade cycle for MK I and II users.
Last edited:

