How about an model that its all values can go to 11? louder, more drive, more saturation, more eq. everything is more!
Ever imagine Randall Smith and the rest of the Mesa engineers looking at a AxeFx III and saying "It's got TOO much stuff in it, it'll break!" or do you think they look at it and say "we would've put three more switches and sliders on it!The Mk6 would only break down spectacularly
"These go to eleven."Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder?
How about an model that its all values can go to 11? louder, more drive, more saturation, more eq. everything is more!
I had the 120 version for years and it worked ok until you have footswitch problems rendering the channel switching useless. My only concern would be Cliff and the team lifting it up on a bench...would shut down FAS with hernias for all! Not sure you could even model it without adding 40 pounds to each FAS device!Just don't make a Peavey Triumph 60. It was my first tube amp and I bought it based on other people's advice. That was a horrible amp. It never worked when playing with others, just couldn't get any tone out of it. Frustrated the hell out of me.
I totally agree! Viva Cliff!300 should be whatever Cliff wants. It’s his celebration.
So no 80’s Gorilla?For the 300th amp can we get that shitty 10 watt practice amp that gets bundled in with squire guitars.
View attachment 107266
This is pure class.The B.C. Rich Devastator
50 Watts of Simulated-Tube Power
that roughly emulates the sound of
15 Watts of EMF Static
vaguely tuned to the pitches
of the notes you're fretting
Accept No Substitutes.
View attachment 107309
Well, it would be the first time we've had an endangered species on the Axe.So no 80’s Gorilla?
How do we up vote this x100?a Rivera TBR1 SL would be a nice addition! I used to own one, and I have a friend who still has his.