Rush… is it true?

But they said they wouldn't and that's what I'm hung up on.
The level of magic/wonder/inspiration those three... utter gentlemen (ALWAYS)... created? One less than four, innit? ha!

I bet they will be seriously cathartic events for MANY. These are exceptional individuals. They were SO fortunate to go on such a journey together, after crossing paths. Thankfully we... well... ... ... you know the rest.

I know for certain... Neil would say... what took you so long? Enough jamming in your tightie-whities... get out there and Roll the...

Tears. Will. Flow. This dirty world needs it.

The respect that these two of three (+Neil's family... and the entire surviving extended-operation family) will handle this with...

Will be pure class... and Grace, too!
 
against. I love Rush and even though a lifelong student could get through the percussion parts, Geddy lost his voice a long time ago. If they stuck with mainstream vocal tunes from Moving Pictures or Permanent Waves then perhaps, but Geddy has been struggling with early stuff for a long time.
Like I said, this is coming from a huge fan.
If they keep attempting early Rush where the vocal lines called dogs, I'd rather see them do pub nights with guest star vocalists where the music is tight and guest star vocalists take their turn.
They just need to retire some songs, not necessarily retire.
 
Mixed emotions on this announcement, so happy and confused at the same time. Part of me thinks they should just let it go and other part is rock it!
Neil Peart has always held a special place in my musical heart and to hear a Rush song with someone else's embellishment is somewhat disconcerting. That said to deny others from hearing Rush live that have never had the chance is a shame.
 
I like that they're doing it. I'm a Rush fan, but I guess I wouldn't say I'm a die-hard one. I'm not too precious about their legacy and reunion tour to feel any ill-will about it. I think it's great they're doing it and they'll get to play Rush music to new and old fans alike. I love they went a totally different direction with the drummer choice - if anything it moves people away from comparing drummers and to just enjoying the music. You have to enjoy it for what it is. I'm sure they know that some people will complain but it's not for them. I don't think they're taking this on to compete with their legacy - they're just putting out a new flavor.
 
Looking closer, the tour image is pretty touching.

There are two birds (Alex and Geddy) close together on a wire, and a third bird (Neil) flying off. With a rusty green light signifying that it's time and that it's ok to move on.
 

Attachments

  • rush-50-header-text-1-1030x630.webp
    rush-50-header-text-1-1030x630.webp
    96.5 KB · Views: 39
Last edited:
I don't get all the hand-wringing.


If you used to be in a band, and your band broke up because a bandmate died, and you want to play your music again, go for it!

If you want to call your band a certain name, and you can legally do that, go for it!

If you have to hire a replacement for your deceased bandmate — and you will have to do that — go for it!

If a loyal fan protests that doing this without the deceased bandmate is just wrong, ask that fan to perform a resurrection ritual. When that ritual fails, thank them for their zealotry. Then invite them to the show. :)
 
Last edited:
I'm sure they know that some people will complain but it's not for them. I don't think they're taking this on to compete with their legacy - they're just putting out a new flavor.
I would bet you are correct! nevertheless the old Rush fans that are used to hearing Neil Peart on the drums, they are going to put a ruler to it plain and simple! Whether or not they like it is up to them to decide.
 
Last edited:
If a loyal fan protests that doing this without the deceased bandmate is just wrong, ask that fan to perform a resurrection ritual. When that ritual fails, thank them for their zealotry. Then invite them to the show. :)
True, true. A great part about the show is that they are planning to have a big Neal tribute at each show, which I'm sure will be amazing. Like most things, the people who complain about it not being the right thing to do in regards to Neal are getting offended on behalf of someone else. Geddy and Alex knew and loved Neal more than anyone, so if they're good with it, that's good enough for me. 🤷‍♂️
 
Geddy and Alex knew and loved Neal more than anyone, so if they're good with it, that's good enough for me. 🤷‍♂️
This.

Rush is known for being thoughtful, intelligent and generous-minded people and having thoughtful, intelligent and generous-minded fans. Now it’s like half of those fans overdosed on gossip magazines. Influencers are posting “What do we think of this?” videos, along with the trite hand-rubbing-chin influencer pose.

“We?” Speak for yourself, and don’t presume to tell me what I think. I think it’s pretty cool.
 
Rush is known for being thoughtful, intelligent and generous-minded people and having thoughtful, intelligent and generous-minded fans.
Yeah, and Alex and Geddy are well-known for being best-buds dorks since before I was born (I think, must double check "My Effing Life").

Neil's family has given their blessing. That being the case, if the two of them have decided it's more fun than painful to make that big ol' noise on stage live again, is there anything at all wrong with that? I think not.

I'm really happy for them. Don't know that I'll spend a small fortune to travel to one of the shows. I'm pretty content to let my last memory of them live be that amazing R40 show.
 
Not holding out that this is going to be anything epic. I got the chance to see them back in the 80's a couple times and it was worth the admission. While I appreciate the possibility that these guys miss playing live so much that they're willing to do it one more time there are a few things that make me feel this isn't going to be anything special. These guys are like 10 years older than me, I can only imagine how tough it may be on them to get this done. I recall watching a doc somewhere, don't recall which one it was but it was several years ago. They were talking about the possibility of hanging things up back then. Alex had arthritis and was on the fence about touring again, Neal's feet and overall health were taking their toll on him. I think most of us can agree Geddy's voice isn't close to what it was as well. Add on top of that they mention they're going to hand over some keyboard work etc. to other artists so they can basically hang out together on stage and it's starting to sound like an "old man's" tour where one may get the impression that it's like the las vegas version of a once great act. The kind where rather than paying close attention to cues, each other and the overall show they're presenting it's more like they''re just having fun, waving to the audience, cracking jokes while playing etc. That kinda ruins it for me anyway. You could see them doing a bit of that in some of their last few concert videos.

Their music will be around forever and there will always be new Rush fans. But this feels like it could end up being something like Ozzy's last tour where he sat in a chair and barely had the breath to get through a set. I appreciated what he did for the fans, but if you go there hoping to see something anywhere close what what they were I think some will be disappointed. Kinda like how when I saw them in the 80's and they were really into playing their music and they sounded tight. It felt like a real show. I'm not feeling like it's a money grab, I believe these guys wanna keep playing forever and there'll always be people wanting to see them but I'm not thinking they're going to go out with a bang here, more like a whimper considering arthritis, old vocal chords and half the band being kids with some of them hidden in the dark so all we see are the two guys left on stage.

I hope I'm wrong, but I've seen this happen before. Like painfully watching Billy Joel try to sing as an old man. Sounded terrible. Never saw him again after that. There's just too many issues that ruined the experience.
 
Last edited:
Not holding out that this is going to be anything epic. I got the chance to see them back in the 80's a couple times and it was worth the admission. While I appreciate the possibility that these guys miss playing live so much that they're willing to do it one more time there are a few things that make me feel this isn't going to be anything special. These guys are like 10 years older than me, I can only imagine how tough it may be on them to get this done. I recall watching a doc somewhere, don't recall which one it was but it was several years ago. They were talking about the possibility of hanging things up back then. Alex had arthritis and was on the fence about touring again, Neal's feet and overall health were taking their toll on him. I think most of us can agree Geddy's voice isn't close to what it was as well. Add on top of that they mention they're going to hand over some keyboard work etc. to other artists so they can basically hang out together on stage and it's starting to sound like an "old man's" tour where one may get the impression that it's like the las vegas version of a once great act. The kind where rather than paying close attention to cues, each other and the overall show they're presenting it's more like they''re just having fun, waving to the audience, cracking jokes while playing etc. That kinda ruins it for me anyway. You could see them doing a bit of that in some of their last few concert videos.

Their music will be around forever and there will always be new Rush fans. But this feels like it could end up being something like Ozzy's last tour where he sat in a chair and barely had the breath to get through a set. I appreciated what he did for the fans, but if you go there hoping to see something anywhere close what what they were I think some will be disappointed. Kinda like how when I saw them in the 80's and they were really into playing their music and they sounded tight. It felt like a real show. I'm not feeling like it's a money grab, I believe these guys wanna keep playing forever and there'll always be people wanting to see them but I'm not thinking they're going to go out with a bang here, more like a whimper considering arthritis, old vocal chords and half the band being kids with some of them hidden in the dark so all we see are the two guys left on stage.

I hope I'm wrong, but I've seen this happen before. Like painfully watching Billy Joel try to sing as an old man. Sounded terrible. Never saw him again after that. There's just too many issues that ruined the experience.
"... it's more like they''re just having fun, waving to the audience, cracking jokes while playing ..."

I'd buy a ticket for that.
 
I wish they had a show closer to me but they don’t. I’ll watch videos of it for sure. I’m happy for Alex and Geddy and especially Anika. I’ve seen her play with Jeff Beck and she’ll do a great job on this gig. She’s the perfect pick.
 
I just heard and excerpt of the interview where Geddy Lee announced this tour, and he said that he and Alex felt like it was lifting a black cloud off of them when they would play Rush songs in their studio time recently, which is what got them to even consider it! I salute them for their decision and hope that Neil is of the same energy from his current Pearch (mis-spelling intentional) ;~))
 
I wish they didn’t call this Rush.

They should call it Lee & Lifeson: An Evening of Rush Music.

That's what it really is rather than the 3.

It's the same mental hangup I have with Steve Howe and friends touring as Yes

I agree totally. But commercially that would attract less people. I even more agree on Yes. It’s a shame that that holds the Yes name. But from a commercial standpoint I understand.
 
Back
Top Bottom