The problem to is you have 2 different models of the FM3 and one has 11% more CPUThings we know at the moment:
They're working on it.
The amp block updates are ported.
The spring reverb is/was causing headaches.
I would be okay with a release for each version lol.The problem to is you have 2 different models of the FM3 and one has 11% more CPU
So what if gapless and spring is running on that one but it takes it to the limit
You don’t have that 11% to play with on the OG
It’s a dilemma, you can’t or don’t really want to release features only exclusive to turbo BUT the reality is it has the advantage and extra wiggle room of 10% CPU which doesn’t seem like much maybe but when you are fighting to save 3 or 4% I bet it becomes a factor
Do you own the turbo ?I would be okay with a release for each version lol.
It would put extra work on the engineers unfortunately but why limit the most recent FM3?
Future sales of the current model would benefit from having the best possible design.
Could it perhaps be made a switchable option in settings so the extra processing could be restored for those not bothered by gaps or needing a little extra?
I do own the turbo model.Do you own the turbo ?
Honest question what if you only had the OG would you feel the same way ?
Also I have no horse in the race I am an FM9 owner, but I am just playing devils advocate
I think you’re reading too much into this. Your FM3 is doing way more with its CPU than just amp modeling. If gapless switching does take a little extra CPU, that doesn’t mean it’s a deal killer. That just means that maybe you can’t have all seventeen blocks in that preset.The problem to is you have 2 different models of the FM3 and one has 11% more CPU
So what if gapless and spring is running on that one but it takes it to the limit
You don’t have that 11% to play with on the OG
I am an FM9 guy , but I agree 100% with spreading your sounds across several presets , if gapless becomes and optionI think you’re reading too much into this. Your FM3 is doing way more with its CPU than just amp modeling. If gapless switching does take a little extra CPU, that doesn’t mean it’s a deal killer. That just means that maybe you can’t have all seventeen blocks in that preset.
And with gapless, you wouldn’t need all those blocks in one preset anyway.
It would also needlessly segment the units.I would be okay with a release for each version lol.
It would put extra work on the engineers unfortunately but why limit the most recent FM3?
By the logic, it'd mean they have to maintain three versions for the FX3, three for the FM9 and two for the FM3. That's a LOT harder than only three. Remember, Fractal is a small company with developers who work their butts off, and who have set and maintained a standard of support and upgrades that no other company in the modeling work approaches.Future sales of the current model would benefit from having the best possible design.
It will be soon, but first they have to launch an FM3 into space and install the update remotely to make sure it's safe.Is it in private beta yet?
Dude! You weren’t supposed to share that information.It will be soon, but first they have to launch an FM3 into space and install the update remotely to make sure it's safe.
The spawn of the demon core get frighteningly smaller every year.Oh crap I accidentally revealed the top secret Fractal Space Program with the ultimate goal of putting the upcoming Axe-Fx IV on the moon before Neural gets there first.