nikki-k
Experienced
I have to disagree, at least in part. I *think* I understand what you are saying, but may be incorrect.Not to start a philosophical discussion, but I want to note that if you want to look at it like that, many or all of the advanced parameters can be viewed as "realism reduction", because the real amps have fixed values for these things, and when you adjust, you're moving away from the "real amp" values. For me, in the end who cares? It's all about tonal flexibility, and the Axe is awesome in this regard and continues to become even more so.
With a real amp, the parameters and corresponding values are available, albeit, in certain cases, not in a direct, "this-is-this" aspect. For instance, while the "Bright Cap" value can correspond to a single component value in a real amp, when one moves to, say, a Plexi, this becomes a "value of function," rather than a "single component's value." As such, when adjusting this value with the Plexi, I approach as a "general shaping value" rather than a directly translatable, singular capacitor value.
The fact that the Axe affords us values that would be (incredibly) difficult to implement in a real amp is beside the point IMO, as we are afforded the ability to directly assign an *absolute* value to a component (when, and as, applicable) in the Axe, just as in a real amp (I cite the Bright Cap value once again). Further, with the inability to do direct component replacements/modifications (in most cases).. as we are afforded with a real amp.. but rather are afforded a set of general, (typically) broad(er) scope, "component tailoring" parameters, we are thus relegated (not in a bad way!!!) to consider, and then apply, such "tweaks" as we may feel most appropriately reflects a similar modification in a real amp. One only need look to the various power and preamp tube parameters, or transformer, etc, and it becomes apparent; while we cannot trade OTs as a direct analog of doing so with a real amp, we can (at least) approximate the impact and affect of such a change, at least in a broad scope manner. We would not be capable (yet? ) approximating the more specific tonal characteristics of two similar OTs.. or, say, two different makes of EL34's.. but we can get in a "ballpark" (at least).
However!!! The Axe does also afford those "transient" values.. those bits of "in between," and manners of constructing that which is difficult, improbable, ridiculous, etc with a real amp. But, I also see this as an ability to engage and celebrate imagination. This is yet another way in which I personally celebrate my Axe-Fx II as not replacement of anything, but augmentation. It is.. what my tube amps are, and are not capable of. It is my "pedal lab" without a tangle of cables to wrestle with. It is my rack of effects without archaic, cryptic interfacing. But, once again, it is not replacement. 'Cause sometimes, I want to see and feel the glow of tubes. I want to wreck neurons with the smoke of my lead filled solder. And sometimes I welcome the frustration of a "pedal cable rodeo."
If my tube amps are my crayons, the Axe is my paints.