I have this problem only with this firmware on my FM9, as if the gapless was not active.
Try to resave the presets. They should be shown with inverted numbers when not 'saved under the current firmware'.Is there only me in this case?
when loading a preset that was created using a previous firmware version the preset number will be shown in inverted text on the large font home GUI. This indicates that the preset needs to be saved under the current firmware to update it for compatibility with “Gapless Changes – ALL". Presets created and saved with the
currently running firmware also load faster in general.
I had already had this problem, but it's not that.Try to resave the presets. They should be shown with inverted numbers when not 'saved under the current firmware'.
Make sure to read this quote, including the bold last line:
I had indeed had this problem with the FW 9.0 beta 2, and it was indeed this solution that solved my problem.Try to resave the presets. They should be shown with inverted numbers when not 'saved under the current firmware'.
Make sure to read this quote, including the bold last line:
I don't have much presets with >70% load, so i can't confirm or deny.Is there only me in this case?
Good to hear that!I had indeed had this problem with the FW 9.0 beta 2, and it was indeed this solution that solved my problem.
I no longer had this latency problem.
Well, you need to make them a bit less CPU greedy. You can find tips on the wiki: https://wiki.fractalaudio.com/wiki/index.php?title=CPU_usage#CPU_usage_management. If you're still having trouble, post one of your problematic presets and maybe we can help you with lowering the CPU usage.It's really with the FW 9.01 that I can't work with a CPU that is too loaded
Thank you for your quick feedback.Good to hear that!
Well, you need to make them a bit less CPU greedy. You can find tips on the wiki: https://wiki.fractalaudio.com/wiki/index.php?title=CPU_usage#CPU_usage_management. If you're still having trouble, post one of your problematic presets and maybe we can help you with lowering the CPU usage.
notice that with this firmware, after several tests, that if the CPU is above 70%, I have a latency between changing the presets.
Whether with my AXE FX III, my FM3 or my FM9, I have presets quite loaded in CPU, but I always manage not to exceed 78/80% and I have no worries.
I have this problem only with this firmware on my FM9, as if the gapless was not active.
I have this problem only with this firmware on my FM9, as if the gapless was not active.
Weird it is FM9 specific. You could upload two FM9 presets and add an audio recording of the gap you experience when switching between them on the FM9. So we can see what we can reproduce...For my use, 70% CPU, it curbs me a lot
Do you have a gap in audio or just a delay in switching?Good evening,
I notice that with this firmware, after several tests, that if the CPU is above 70%, I have a latency between changing the presets.
Whether with my AXE FX III, my FM3 or my FM9, I have presets quite loaded in CPU, but I always manage not to exceed 78/80% and I have no worries.
I have this problem only with this firmware on my FM9, as if the gapless was not active.
If I lighten a series of presets, with a CPU between 65 and 70%, and I alternate between them, it works very well.
Is there only me in this case?
Otherwise, I take this opportunity to warmly thank the entire fractal team, who do a great job, and who regularly update their products to compete with perfection on a daily basis.
For 25 years that I have been doing this job, it is by far the best investment I have been able to make
Thank you!!
The bot insisted on downloading the update even though I had already done so. Then it prompted to install the three files. I updated the USB first. Then the FM9 firmware. As usual it asked me to reboot the FM9 when finished. Now it has a white screen. What should I do?
Thank you for the time you give me.Do you have a gap in audio or just a delay in switching?
Do your presets have a lot of modifiers?
Post 2 presets that demonstrate the behavior so others can test.
I think he meant that the user interface in FM9-EDIT lags / is slow compared to the actual preset change on the unit. Which is a good thing. IIRC this is because updating the UI gets the least priority in the unit. (It would be nice though if the UI would refresh a bit faster.)but i don't know what meant @johe94 about his problem.
Do you have all the required settings for Gapless?It sounds not completly gapless but i don't know what meant @johe94 about his problem.
In fact, it is on the screen of the unit that I have latency, even without being connected to FM9-EDIT.I think he meant that the user interface in FM9-EDIT lags / is slow compared to the actual preset change on the unit. Which is a good thing. IIRC this is because updating the UI gets the least priority in the unit. (It would be nice though if the UI would refresh a bit faster.)
Yes, of caurse.Do you have all the required settings for Gapless?
- Gapless == ON
- Spillover == ALL