Yeah. Better hold off a few days, eh?One more update? It's not Friday, not even close.
I worked as computer operator on an IBM 3600 in the late 70’s.10 in 71 - I remember punch cards from collage - damn reader machine "blew chunks" with my stack of 100s of cards on more than one occaision.
Probably better served in another thread and maybe with some cleaning up of your question. But that's just meForgive me if I'm misunderstood (likely), and/or posting this in the wrong part of the forum (definitely) since it doesn't exactly pertain to this firmware update, but more so a inquisition to an existing solution (probably), or suggestion for a future update (possibly).. ~Is there/could there be a way for firmware to have an option either in the output block(preferably), or amp block to simply switch off the power amp sim/supply sag for a designated output specifically for connecting to a tube amp fx return for a live application WITHOUT (keyword) having to create an entire duplicate fx chain at, and post the amp block for that output and using up more cpu just to bypass 1 parameter? (also the cab block, but not AS big of a deal obviously) since it's what I would guess to be a common connection. Let me know if there's a current work-around for this type of thing, thanksss
Forgive me if I'm misunderstood (likely), and/or posting this in the wrong part of the forum (definitely) since it doesn't exactly pertain to this firmware update, but more so a inquisition to an existing solution (probably), or suggestion for a future update (possibly).. ~Is there/could there be a way for firmware to have an option either in the output block(preferably), or amp block to simply switch off the power amp sim/supply sag for a designated output specifically for connecting to a tube amp fx return for a live application WITHOUT (keyword) having to create an entire duplicate fx chain at, and post the amp block for that output and using up more cpu just to bypass 1 parameter? (also the cab block, but not AS big of a deal obviously) since it's what I would guess to be a common connection. Let me know if there's a current work-around for this type of thing, thanksss
What you’re asking for is a way to make the Amp block behave in one way at one output, and behave a different way on another output. If you want two different behaviors from the Amp block, you need two Amp blocks. Just like with real amps.Forgive me if I'm misunderstood (likely), and/or posting this in the wrong part of the forum (definitely) since it doesn't exactly pertain to this firmware update, but more so a inquisition to an existing solution (probably), or suggestion for a future update (possibly).. ~Is there/could there be a way for firmware to have an option either in the output block(preferably), or amp block to simply switch off the power amp sim/supply sag for a designated output specifically for connecting to a tube amp fx return for a live application WITHOUT (keyword) having to create an entire duplicate fx chain at, and post the amp block for that output and using up more cpu just to bypass 1 parameter? (also the cab block, but not AS big of a deal obviously) since it's what I would guess to be a common connection. Let me know if there's a current work-around for this type of thing, thanksss
Maybe it could be a good feature for a future update if it were somehow integrated in the output block if that's even a thing.. just try to imagine it. It could be awesome
Maybe it could be a good feature for a future update if it were somehow integrated in the output block if that's even a thing.. just try to imagine it. It could be awesome
posting this in the wrong part of the forum (definitely) since it doesn't exactly pertain to this firmware update...