Indeed. The only grouping that would make sense is by brand, not sure if it's feasible for legal reasons though.Already explained why this isn't really possible.
Fender == Felix (Leo) <- get it... cat?Indeed. The only grouping that would make sense is by brand, not sure if it's feasible for legal reasons though.
Dimebag “Dereal” Chainsaw is what you need for his elusive tone. See Home Depot aisle KAnyone have any suggestions for a base amp (or settings on an amp) for trying to model a Randall amp by replacing the tubes with a transistor tube type? I think negative feedback will be hugely impactful here. Yes...I'm trying to chase the Dimebag tone![]()
The trademarked brand name and model could be hidden from display but still participate in searching and sorting.Indeed. The only grouping that would make sense is by brand, not sure if it's feasible for legal reasons though.
Im sure someone will tell me I'm nuts...
But this thing sounds absolutely enormous. There's something about the mids that is so fat and juicy.

I appreciate the effort, but I have questions. If all of the JCM800 circuits are together under hot-rodded, shouldn’t all of the Plexi circuits be together.., wherever they land? …and all of the Vox/Vox-adjacent ones?Spent some time trying to sort em out. I have no doubt missed some amps and misplaced some amp models, but this is how I imagined the categorization being laid out.
This was done first in the VP4, glad its being implemented in the other units.Cliff: I'll group Reverbs, seems simple and intuitive
Forum: Group every setting
![]()
Grouping the Amps is next to impossible in the hardware. The editor could possibly have metadata allowing filtering.

What about a consistent naming by brand? Like adding "Brit" as the first word for all marshall models (not all of them currently have it iirc), something like "Fnd" or "Fullertone" for all fenders, "USA" for mesa, "Vx" for vox, etc.Grouping the Amps is next to impossible in the hardware. The editor could possibly have metadata allowing filtering.
That's better. I only use the software because the hardware itself isn't as intuitive.Grouping the Amps is next to impossible in the hardware. The editor could possibly have metadata allowing filtering.
How did you do this? I don't have the option to change the diodes.@FractalAudio
THANK YOU CLIFF FOR THE BOSS HM-2!
I am one of the users who always wanted the HM-2 on the Axe-Fx 3.
I remember you saying something along the lines of "there's a ton going on with the mid-frequencies there" about the pedal.
I also wondered whether this would cause it to be challenging to replicate the pedal in the digital realm.
Last evening, I compared the Swedish Metal side-by-side will the real thing. A BOSS HM-2, which was a Christman present in 1990. It runs on 12v, not 9v, so I stuck a square battery in it and off we go! Bork, Bork!
The Fractal version is fan-tast-ic, thank you.
The only real difference I could find [with my ears] was the Fractal version had a tiny bit more 'body.'
All I did was turn the bass down a tiny bit on the Fractal and bingo! I would put that down to... [I don't have your technical vocabulary], a difference caused by the cumulative effect of components having different tolerances?
After that, I became confused. A few times I lost track and couldn't tell if I had the physical pedal on or the Fractal version.
Guys, you get all these derivatives of the HM-2 out there, right?
Roll your own. Experiment, do odd stuff, see what happens, you can have your own modded HM-2.
I kept the diode type as the original, but increased the number of diodes to four [on the left] and replaced the diode on the right with a single white LED.
Different flavour of HM-2!
No soldering or inhaling of the fumes required.