jclemensfl
Inspired
This is true. But everyone makes mistakes. Maybe Cliff finally implemented the LARGE FONT and just forgot to tell us?Yes, the fat chance
It's pretty easy to read the release notes in the first post...
This is true. But everyone makes mistakes. Maybe Cliff finally implemented the LARGE FONT and just forgot to tell us?Yes, the fat chance
It's pretty easy to read the release notes in the first post...
I also fool with that (as well as transformer match) for a more open tone/feel. Both of these can significantly change the gain character so depending on what I want I might leave them or crank them to preference.Negative Feedback
The models seem to have more compression (more noticeable in the Matchless). The second part is meant to show the compression difference I was hearing/feeling.
Great job, Cliff! Thank you for all of your hard work. The Axe-Fx III continues to be the best piece of musical equipment I've ever purchased
We must have the same model and year Matchless. Had it sent down to Oz when I was working there. A friend of mine was a sales guy for them at the time. We play different stuff, but you nailed the sound. The Matchless, the 1981 Marshall 2203, the 1959 5F8 Twin, and the 1966 AB763 Super Reverb are my desert island amps. Thanks to Fractal Audio, these and others are always on the same stage. Plus, never have to rewire a goddam pedalboard!Man, that '93 D30 head is one of the best sounding amps I've ever owned and sounds incredible clean, broken up, driven to mid gain, and diming the volume while using a tele is one of the coolest distorted tones I've ever heard! That's an amp I really want to accurately match with the Fractal.
This is great! I definitely want it punchy since that's such a great quality of Class-A amps... when notes "explode" off the guitar as soon as you pluck a string. It's very dynamic and touch sensitive.
Looks like I need to play around with Negative Feedback and Supply Sag as well as the PI Bias Excursion ( thanks @yyz67 ) to get that model feeling snappy.
The Input Dynamics parameter is fun and something I'll probably use with other amps because it does give you more attack in a cool way, but I'd love to find a solution for the D30 that feels similar without adding gain.
yep, changing the power tube type killed the noise. the cable is OK already tested with 3 guitars.
The same happens to me!!100% agreed
As a touring musician, whose home base has been Class A el84 amps for the last 20 years.
I have no doubt the ac30 and matchless dc30 is modeled to complete accuracy with the reference amps.
I just haven’t ever been able to get the same punch and less compression (looking for a more open but musical compression, even though verbally that is an oxymoron) as I can get out of my couple of AC30’s (normal or topboost) and Matchless dc30.
Would love to know how to bring more of that out.
It is definitely addicting to your right hand, when that is what you’re used to.
No offense intended at all. Just my experience and I still find the current models usable, just different on that right hand.
I'm really liking this Firmware so far! It's fun to A/B real amps vs the models, so I made a couple short clips comparing my '93 Sampson era Matchless D-30 to the Matchbox D-30 and my '96 Marshall JCM Slash to the Brit Silver. The amps went into a Fractal LB-2 load box and the models used the LB-2 UK impedance curve with Speaker Drive, Speaker Compression, and Speaker Thump all at zero. Both the amps and the Axe-Fx III used the same IR and IR loading plugin in my DAW (no cab block was used in the Fractal). I used a looper pedal and started with the amp and model knobs in the same settings and fine-tuned them in by ear. I'm sure I could get closer, but it's already pretty dang close without making any drastic knob adjustments.
To me, they sound virtually identical when playing chords. It's truly remarkable, and I don't think anyone could tell the difference in a mix. Each amp's character really shines... even though both the Jubilee and the D-30 are all going through the same IR. The main difference I notice is in the transients. The models seem to have more compression (more noticeable in the Matchless). To show this, the clips start with the amp/model playing chords to show how similar they sound (no low/high cuts). The second part is meant to show the compression difference I was hearing/feeling.
If anyone knows how to lessen that compression to bring out more attack in the transients, I'd love to try your methods.
Anyway, here they are:
Marshall JCM Slash vs Brit Silver
Matchless D-30 vs Matchbox D-30
Great job, Cliff! Thank you for all of your hard work. The Axe-Fx III continues to be the best piece of musical equipment I've ever purchased.
I'm not sure you will ever get a 1:1 like for like image. After all, there is an extra A/D and D/A conversion when using a modeler.Nice clips! Sounds closer than ever but I def hear what you’re referring to
As noted by @FractalAudio, with the new DynaCab update, existing presets are automatically updated so they stay the same after the update.
That's a separate issue currently in someone else's hands. I'll provide more info when I can.Thanks, but what about block library cab blocks and importing .syx preset files?
Matchless + tele sounds like a great combo. I guess I need a tele......Man, that '93 D30 head is one of the best sounding amps I've ever owned and sounds incredible clean, broken up, driven to mid gain, and diming the volume while using a tele is one of the coolest distorted tones I've ever heard! That's an amp I really want to accurately match with the Fractal.
This is great! I definitely want it punchy since that's such a great quality of Class-A amps... when notes "explode" off the guitar as soon as you pluck a string. It's very dynamic and touch sensitive.
Looks like I need to play around with Negative Feedback and Supply Sag as well as the PI Bias Excursion ( thanks @yyz67 ) to get that model feeling snappy.
The Input Dynamics parameter is fun and something I'll probably use with other amps because it does give you more attack in a cool way, but I'd love to find a solution for the D30 that feels similar without adding gain.
I think you’re confused, the modeler was not taken into a loadbox then to the IR. Both the modeler and the LB were processed through the same DAW and IR directly out of each. Within the software, the impedance curve which matches that of the LB (what the real amps were seeing) was utilized.I'm not sure you will ever get a 1:1 like for like image. After all, there is an extra A/D and D/A conversion when using a modeler.
a. guitar into amp, amp out to loadbox loaded with IR
b: guitar into modeler, out of modeler into loadbox loaded with IR
whatever is being done at A/D/A level will be a factor and each modeler use their own methodologies. It's already close enough for me.
You GUESS?!I guess I need a tele
Well played!
100% agreed
As a touring musician, whose home base has been Class A el84 amps for the last 20 years.
I have no doubt the ac30 and matchless dc30 is modeled to complete accuracy with the reference amps.
I just haven’t ever been able to get the same punch and less compression (looking for a more open but musical compression, even though verbally that is an oxymoron) as I can get out of my couple of AC30’s (normal or topboost) and Matchless dc30.
Would love to know how to bring more of that out.
It is definitely addicting to your right hand, when that is what you’re used to.
No offense intended at all. Just my experience and I still find the current models usable, just different on that right hand.