ta6rma
Inspired
FAS is BETTER than a Rolls Royce!FAS is a Rolls Royce
If you buy a Rolls Royce they don't give you a better engine or a nicer interior for free every six weeks
FAS is BETTER than a Rolls Royce!FAS is a Rolls Royce
Cliff,It would free up space. Invariably someone would complain though.
Have you ever looked at that parameter? It's not that it currently allows you to go back 32 revisions ...
It would free up space. Invariably someone would complain though.
It sounds like there are these two options on the table:
No Mark I/II user can ever update past 4.01
Or:
Only people that are willing to give up being able to use older modeling versions will be able to update with the latest FW.
IOW, people that still want to use older versions would be frozen at 4.01 either way. But at least those of us (count me as one) who are willing to give up the older versions would be able to update past 4.01. Sounds like a no-brainer to me: A few Mark I/II owners dissappointed vs. all of the Mark I/II owners dissappointed.
I say remove it, I NEVER use the older firmwares. If someone wants the older one, then they should flash it to that firmware.
Great update, and I LOVE the new amps + Recto revisions.
That one guy can pound sand. If a leaned out version is what it takes to get us a few more miles down the road, we're all willing to take the hit for losing obsolesced functionalities.It would free up space. Invariably someone would complain though.
Arm chair quarterbacks fo sho. I'm a programmer by trade and it's simple fact that removing code saves space. How much and if it's worth it ultimately is up to Cliff.I'm amazed at the number of people who are familiar with the intrinsic design and technical details of the Axe-Fx II firmware. ;-)