But … they say you can read the tone match … how without the block ?
In the cab block
Yep as Peteri says, the Tone match creates an IR file that can be used in Cab Block.
But … they say you can read the tone match … how without the block ?
In the cab block
Not that I saw.Was this ever answered?
Cliff mentioned that they’re working on some aspects of it including the virtual capo. I got the feeling like it won’t be fully ported to the FM9 at launch but likely down the road.Man I hope it does. One of the few things I ever wished improvement on with my fm3.
The Revival has power amp modeling?Just run a Revival Drive Compact in the loop Next to the FM3's Plexi, the Revival Drive is the best pedal hands down.
I don't know. In the video from Chris, he says that reverb doesn't move the CPU meter much because of a dedicated core. One might infer various things from that.....which would almost certainly turn out to be completely wrong.Does this mean that one of my presets in the Axe-Fx III would be to need to be running at less than 50% cpu in order for me to replicate and use it on the FM9?
Apparently I even misconstrued what Chris said in the video. I guess I'm having a bad morning....I'll shut up now.Can I just say - I think the CPU core dedicated to reverb is a genius idea. That alone is worth it for me
You can connect SPDIF to an AES input at 48K. No converter needed, just an adapter. It’s the same format essentially. The amplitude is lower on SPDIF but most pro gear won’t mind.Too bad, FM9 doesn’t have AES digital out….. The best way to connect to a digital board.
this makes no sense to me. the FM3 is a small unit with 3 switches. the FM9 is a bigger unit with 9 switches. there are many people who need the smaller unit still.
you could make the same argument that the Axe3 cannibalized FM3 sales due to more CPU power, which also doesn't make sense. they are 3 different products.
none of that has anything to do with "how well" the FM3 was doing.
here's my FM9 Overview video