Windows 11

Microsoft isn't an independent company building an OS. It's a Vanguard Group and BlackRock company making an OS. Those investment firms call the shots, run the plays, and choose what ultimately happens inside those operating systems. They do not have your best interests at heart, instead, they see you as cattle to be quartered as efficiently as possible.
 
<vent>
Years ago I ran a business unit for NEC Semiconductors. I had a dedicated guy onsite at Microsoft (with a desk and everything) in order to work on WHQL driver support for a 3D graphics chip. It turned out to be a nightmare trying to get things sorted - due to MS obfuscation.

I remember that we'd finally gotten a hold of their implementing engineer and so I flew out to Redmond where we'd set up a meeting with him, our onsite engineer, and a software lead on our end. Arriving at the meeting, the MS engineer entered, closely followed (nearly led by the arm) by what I could only describe as a "political officer" (think Cold War Soviet Union). Every question we asked (mind you, we didn't need state secrets, just enough info to figure out why our implementation wasn't passing muster) was deferred to this political officer. The engineer wasn't allowed to speak without first whispering to the political officer what he was going to tell us. It was that insane.

Since then, it's become more and more obvious that the people that wrote the core operating system and the literal shit pile of software (that most of us don't use, don't need, don't want and can't really get rid of) are retired or have passed on.

Way too much crap is included that pertains to corporate IT management and pseudo security implementations, backwards compatibility to systems I haven't even heard of...

It is a sad sad reality of what design by committee becomes, especially when the real talent is no longer around and the new employees and management can barely decipher what's going on in the code, but are afraid (yes, literally afraid) to change anything because the OS bloat has become a veritable Jenga&trade; puzzle. So to make it look like they are accomplishing something, all the BS changes are made that "fix", "improve" and "modernize" things that weren't broken.

<vent/>
Imagine when AI is writing most of the code. No one will know or understand anything about it.
 
Backup and Restore (Windows 7) information I found:

Backup and Restore (Windows 7) is not supported for making new backups. It was left in Windows 10 and Windows 11 so that people who originally used it to make a backup are able to restore that backup. The utility is deprecated (i.e., not being developed) and you will not find a page on Microsoft's website that recommends using B&R for making backups. Instead, Microsoft writes: "For full-disk backup solutions, look for a third-party product from another software publisher."

There are people who continue to use B&R to make backups. Many times they succeed, and sometimes they fail. It's certainly not 'against the law' to use Backup and Restore (Windows 7) for making backups. But it's not supported for that purpose, so if something should go wrong, now or in the future, there are no official solutions.

For myself, personally, backup is critical for me. My life is on my computers. So I choose only supported applications for making (and restoring) backups, and I followed Microsoft's advice to "look for a third-party product from another software publisher". For yourself, I think you should choose whatever solution you prefer.
 
Remember Win Vista?!
insanity GIF
 
There is a "standard" which is called Debian (Ubuntu) & FlatPak. The rest can be ignored.
https://flathub.org
Like many have said already-Way too much invested in windows music software. I am glad Linux works for you. It does NOT and WILL NOT work for me and many others......You certainly are pushing Linux? Do you own stocks? just kidding but I got your argument a zillion posts ago......
 
Requiring secure boot and TPM crap at is the most maddening part. I’ve got family PCs here that are just fine for the wife and kids, but aren’t on new enough motherboards to be “Windows 11 compatible”.

So what am I supposed to do? Throw out perfectly good MoBos and update them so we don’t fall behind on OS patches?

F’ing dumb.
My company is forcing upgrades to Win11. I have plenty of machines running 10 just fine.
I'm instructed to throw those machines in the trash. But I'm fighting to bring the newer
ones up to 11, even though they are deemed "not compatible".

Despite this, I have managed to upgrade 5-10 of these to Win11. Including the latest,
an OLD laptop purchased in 2015, which I just "successfully" upgraded after a few attempts.

This after many failed attempts just to bring Win10 up to date.
Next on the list is a laptop purchased in 2013...
 
My company is forcing upgrades to Win11. I have plenty of machines running 10 just fine.
I'm instructed to throw those machines in the trash. But I'm fighting to bring the newer
ones up to 11, even though they are deemed "not compatible".

Despite this, I have managed to upgrade 5-10 of these to Win11. Including the latest,
an OLD laptop purchased in 2015, which I just "successfully" upgraded after a few attempts.

This after many failed attempts just to bring Win10 up to date.
Next on the list is a laptop purchased in 2013...
Didn't M$ back off on the "requirement" for TPM2 recently-ish?
 
Didn't M$ back off on the "requirement" for TPM2 recently-ish?
That I'm not sure about. I started a while back using a hack that required manually
checking/setting TPM as well as editing the Registry.

The latest hack does everything itself, so I don't know if it checks TPM.
Even on the old 2015 laptop, the newest hack failed first couple times.
Then, it succeeded on 3rd try.
 
Didn't M$ back off on the "requirement" for TPM2 recently-ish?
Still required for an official install. There are workarounds to install without TPM but the catch is your install is no longer supported and you assume responsibility for everything. You may get updates, but if one of those bricks your PC they won't care.
 
By modifying the registry on Windows 10, you can upgrade to Windows 11 while bypassing the TPM 2.0 requirement:

  1. Type regedit and press Enter to open the Registry Editor.
  2. Navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Setup.
  3. Right-click on Setup, select New > Key, and name it LabConfig.
  4. Within LabConfig, create the following DWORD (32-bit)values:
    • BypassTPMCheck → Set it to 1.
    • BypassSecureBootCheck → Set it to 1.
    • BypassRAMCheck → Set it to 1.
  5. Close the Registry Editor and proceed with the installation.
This allows you to bypass the hardware requirements during the upgrade process.

Good luck with the future nightmare that awaits! :tearsofjoy:

Remember, if you do this, there will be no support from MS. A future update blows up your PC and you're on your own.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom