Then you're in luck. The Reverb block is reverb in parallel with the dry signal. So when you put the Reverb block in series with your signal chain, you've already got reverb in parallel. Put Reverb in series with your signal path, and run it 100% wet. That's as wet as any effect can ever get.Yes, that's what I want to do, but was hoping to be able to switch from having them/signal path run in parallel to then run in series to get a really dense ambient 'pad' type effect (similar to 100% wet Strymon cloud)
This is a quite good point. It's a serial connection, but indistinguishable from parallel sonically. And capable of essentially both series and parallel based on mix.Place the Reverb block in series, set Level to 3dB and Mix to 50%, use Input Gain to control the mix. That results in the same thing as putting the block in parallel.
So, you can do that on one channel of the Reverb block and a "normal" series setup on another channel.
Then you can use scenes or other methods to select the channel you want.
Your diagram is showing 2 Reverb blocks either parallel to each other or in series with each other.Thanks everyone - I came up with a similar thought to BobXX using 2 mixer blocks to send signal in the required path, but also appreciated Rex & UnixGuy thoughts came up with 2 potential options based on their input - the lighter mix serial version, but also a variation on that theme which would be hard pan left (verb1) & right (verb2) & then put both outputs balanced + killdry + 100% wet.
Not sure it will illuminate the discussion too much, but a visual representation of what I am trying to achieve below:
View attachment 142183
thanks again for the discussion and ideas.
Only by changing channels to another channel with "normal" settings... Unless you used Scene Controllers (or another modifier) to modify Mix, Level and Input Gain.This is a quite good point. It's a serial connection, but indistinguishable from parallel sonically. And capable of essentially both series and parallel based on mix.
Fair comment. I would have posted that sooner if I could have.Your diagram is showing 2 Reverb blocks either parallel to each other or in series with each other.
I'm not sure that's the solution we're trying to provide an answer for based on your original post...
Ok, so you're wanting to run 2 Reverb blocks in parallel to each other or in series with each other, or just with the rest of the signal?Fair comment. I would have posted that sooner if I could have.
The discussion has helped me out in any case, so I still appreciate everyone's input.
![]()
in series with each other - wanting to 'stack' reverbs so verb1 feeds into verb2 then to output block.Ok, so you're wanting to run 2 Reverb blocks in parallel to each other or in series with each other, or just with the rest of the signal?