Rex
Dignified but Approachable
Yes. Big boom.All this....and assuming the circuit is linear. Add non-linearities and......boom.
Yes. Big boom.All this....and assuming the circuit is linear. Add non-linearities and......boom.
CPU used depends on the parameter and the amp model.I just tested this on an AX8 on 8.02 just for the heck of it, and only see a 1% to 3% increase in CPU% depending on the amp model??
Of coarse....but isn't it strange that the same model and the same parameter adds so much less to the CPU load on the unit with less CPU power to work with?CPU used depends on the parameter and the amp model.
This... and that's why the drive modifier goes "boom boom"All this....and assuming the circuit is linear. Add non-linearities and......boom.
Will Admin please close my account from this Forum.. I don't wanna be a part of this idiocy
See now this is a discussion. *thumbs up*I'll just leave this here........
Axe-Fx II (Mark I) Q9.02......
AX8 Q8.02.....
- Adding a 'High Quality' Reverb - adds around 12%
- Adding a modifier to the 'Drive' on a 'Solo 100 Rhy' model - adds around 10%
Different firmware? Different units? Axe-Fx Bug?
- Adding a 'High Quality' Reverb - adds around 30% (to be expected)
- Adding a modifier to the 'Drive' on a 'Solo 100 Rhy' model - adds around 1% (strange?)
Discuss.........
Whoops. I missed that it was the same model. What happens if you change the parameter? Does CPU use spike the same amount on both units?Of coarse....but isn't it strange that the same model and the same parameter adds so much less to the CPU load on the unit with less CPU power to work with?
See the example in post #45
I think this could be found out by loading two amps in the axe fx and see if this cpu spike disappears.Could it be a high res (Axe II with single amp block) vs normal res (AX8) thing, or does the AX8 amp block also run at high res?
I'll just leave this here........
Axe-Fx II (Mark I) Q9.02......
AX8 Q8.02.....
- Adding a 'High Quality' Reverb - adds around 12%
- Adding a modifier to the 'Drive' on a 'Solo 100 Rhy' model - adds around 10%
Different firmware? Different units? Axe-Fx Bug?
- Adding a 'High Quality' Reverb - adds around 30% (to be expected)
- Adding a modifier to the 'Drive' on a 'Solo 100 Rhy' model - adds around 1% (strange?)
Discuss.........
Yeah.. sure "what gear have you designed".. Actually I have paid $2500 dollar for some equipment, who actually have a SERIOUS, problem with an automated process to go from one value to another.. How f... stupid is that?
It's ME who are asking the questions here, as a costumer and not the audio Fractal..
Please close my account here.. and stop posting in this tread.. I'm out.
Didn't notice any real change in CPU when manipulating the parameter in either unit. Just the initial increase when attaching the parameter to a scene controller.Whoops. I missed that it was the same model. What happens if you change the parameter? Does CPU use spike the same amount on both units?
Tried that already. Same jump in CPU per amp block. attach a controller to one amp's Drive parameter, it jumps 10%, attach it the other amp, it jumps 10% more. Axe-Fx of coarse...I think this could be found out by loading two amps in the axe fx and see if this cpu spike disappears.
Yes I did, even checked CPU% on the hardware itself. Also saved the preset with the controller attached, and re-loaded it to verify..Did you change scenes after adding the scene controller on the AX8? On my XL, The CPU increase didn't show up until I changed scene or amp models.
That supports my theory that the CPU resources are reserved when the modifier is attached whether or not you actually use it.Didn't notice any real change in CPU when manipulating the parameter in either unit. Just the initial increase when attaching the parameter to a scene controller.
Which is a good decision. If the CPU weren't reserved in advance, you could be cruising along happily at 85% CPU usage...until you rock the pedal forward, and jump up to a preset-killing 95%.That supports my theory that the CPU resources are reserved when the modifier is attached whether or not you actually use it.