1. We would like to remind our members that this is a privately owned, run and supported forum. You are here at the invitation and discretion of the owners. As such, rules and standards of conduct will be applied that help keep this forum functioning as the owners desire. These include, but are not limited to, removing content and even access to the forum.

    Please give yourself a refresher on the forum rules you agreed to follow when you signed up.
    Dismiss Notice

Non-Minimum Phase IRs

Discussion in 'Axe-Fx III Discussion' started by FractalAudio, Jan 3, 2019.

  1. FractalAudio

    FractalAudio
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Fractal Audio Systems Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    12,697
    Likes Received:
    82,677
    So I've been doing a lot of critical listening the last couple months and have come to the conclusion I like non-minimum phase IRs better. The difference is subtle. They don't really sound that different but there are differences in the attack and in the feel. They just sound/feel a little more open and realistic.

    Another thing is that they mix very differently. It's less predictable but more natural. The caveat is that it's like mixing real mics, you need to experiment moving each mic in and out whereas with minimum phase you can usually just leave one mic at zero and move the other in and out.

    So here's a zip file of my favorite IR session, the Wellspring session, in non-min phase format for use with the Axe-Fx III. My suggestion is to put them in one of the user banks and compare with the factory min-phase versions. Note that names are a bit different but you should be able to figure it out ;).

    www.fractalaudio.com/downloads/firmware-presets/axe-fx-3/Wellspring_NonMP.zip

    I hope to release all the factory cabs as a non-min phase download in the coming months. We're just very busy with a bunch of other things so it's low on the priority list.
     
  2. lqdsnddist

    lqdsnddist
    Expand Collapse
    Fractal Fanatic

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Messages:
    4,882
    Likes Received:
    5,118
    Very cool and the relentless pursuit of perfection is always unmatched in the industry.

    I’ve always been a fan of the phase effects you’d get from multiple mics. It’s not always desirable, but when it works, it sounds fantastic and adds a certain “real-ness” which sounds like what I’m used to when mic’ing cabs, as it’s hard to totally avoid some phase issues.

    Will be fun to a/b them
     
  3. yek

    yek
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    20,444
    Likes Received:
    23,861
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    The file contains a selection of IRs from Wellspring session 1 as well as session 2, is that right?
     
  4. greiswig

    greiswig
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,222
    Likes Received:
    555
    I vaguely remember working with some aftermarket IRs and thinking that something got lost in converting to minimum phase, but it really didn’t seem like it was enough to worry about at the time. I appreciate the opportunity to have some direct comparisons from this session.

    Is there an opportunity here to change the way the minimum phase conversion works to get the best of both, or is that just technically not feasible? I like being able to mix IRs and not worry about them causing issues with one another.
     
  5. yek

    yek
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    20,444
    Likes Received:
    23,861
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Some commercial vendors supply non-MPT WAVs/IRs. Didn't hear the much of a difference back then. I guess I have to listen again.
     
  6. FractalAudio

    FractalAudio
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Fractal Audio Systems Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    12,697
    Likes Received:
    82,677
    A sampling of IRs from session 2.
     
    yek likes this.
  7. AlbertA

    AlbertA
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    1,562
    Location:
    Frisco, TX
    yeky83 likes this.
  8. WhiteSpace

    WhiteSpace
    Expand Collapse
    Inspired

    Joined:
    May 11, 2018
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    Toronto
    I’ve done a quick search but am not sure of the answer. Could these be used on AX8 or converted with CAbLab lite?
     
  9. xpenno

    xpenno
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,787
    Likes Received:
    651
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    I've always left that option off in cablab, it seems to result in more space/room in the sound, hard to describe but it kind of takes up less sonic bandwidth.
     
  10. FractalAudio

    FractalAudio
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Fractal Audio Systems Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    12,697
    Likes Received:
    82,677
    These are for Axe-Fx III customers. If you are using an AX-8 please buy the pack from our store.
     
    Don Watters and WhiteSpace like this.
  11. edo

    edo
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2013
    Messages:
    989
    Likes Received:
    912
    Location:
    Napoli, IT
    This sounds very interesting! So if one is using his own ir’s (made with cablab3), how does he make the non minimum phase versions to try out?
     
  12. VegaBaby

    VegaBaby
    Expand Collapse
    Fractal Fanatic

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,175
    Likes Received:
    810
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    same here. in fact, I convert my third party IRs into two versions, on and off, in case I should need the minimum version which is rarely the case...
     
    xpenno and bradlake like this.
  13. ben ifin

    ben ifin
    Expand Collapse
    Inspired

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    227
    .... am I right in saying that this only applies to a Cab IR that was "shot" with 2 mics or more ie: no impact / change with 1 x Mic IR's (?)

    Ben
     
  14. AlbertA

    AlbertA
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    1,562
    Location:
    Frisco, TX
    No it applies to 1 mic IR's as well.
     
    ben ifin likes this.
  15. MrGuitarabuse

    MrGuitarabuse
    Expand Collapse
    Fractal Fanatic

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,012
    Likes Received:
    1,998
    Location:
    China/Hong Kong
    Oh, do tell :D
     
  16. ben ifin

    ben ifin
    Expand Collapse
    Inspired

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    227
    Thanks :) My ignorance of course , but I had absolutely no idea that when miking up a cab with 1 Mic that you could have a phase issue. Learn something every day :)

    Ben
     
  17. AlbertA

    AlbertA
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    1,562
    Location:
    Frisco, TX
    Phase issues are a different topic - that indeed occurs if you are trying to mix more than 1 IR.
    It's easier to avoid phase issues with minimum-phase (MP) transformed IRs as they are all time aligned. However, the MP transform essentially throws away the phase information from the original capture and instead derives it from the amplitude response alone.

    Speakers are fairly close to a minimum phase system that's why the difference is subtle, but in my experiments the MP derived phase deviates as the frequency increases. The caveat is that removal of the time-of-flight delay from the original capture is not as precise as with MP transform - so mixing these IRs requires more care, as multiple IRs won't be exactly time aligned.
     
    yeky83 likes this.
  18. ML SOUND LAB

    ML SOUND LAB
    Expand Collapse
    Cab Pack Wizard

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    8,409
    Likes Received:
    12,496
    Many times you'll compare RAW vs MPT and think you hear something but then you don't and then you do again. I don't really believe in making IR mixes in post anyways because it's extremely unrealistic but even when doing that you'll get very different results when using RAW vs MPT and this is where it's easier to notice the differences. Me and some other IR producers have had chats about this and I believe the consensus is that you'll get different sounds but who's to say one is better than the other.

    That being said I know some people very high up in the industry that said that my real life mixes that are MPT'd in post "are the best of both worlds". It's not a fake multi-mic-mix made out of multiple MPT IR's but just one MPT process. I personally prefer RAW for everything for the sake of wanting everything to be as realistic as possible but I'm sure that if I posted clips with soundcloud compression comparing MPT vs RAW the majority would have a hard time saying which is which. It's more of a feel thing for me and just like Cliff said if you do the criminal act of mixing separate IR's in post then it'll act more like real mics in real life.
     
  19. ben ifin

    ben ifin
    Expand Collapse
    Inspired

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    227
    My brain hurts :) ..... so if you are using 1 x IR only and that 1 x IR was mic'ed with 1 x Mic only ...... the issues Cliff mentioned in the OP still apply (?)

    Ben
     
  20. AlbertA

    AlbertA
    Expand Collapse
    Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    1,562
    Location:
    Frisco, TX
    Cliff just posted a subset of the factory IRs with no minimum phase transformation applied. They sound subtly different.

    The second paragraph is about mixing these no minimum phase transform IRS. If you are just using 1 IR, yeah it doesn't apply.
     
    ben ifin likes this.

Share This Page