Line6 Helix Stadium

Status
Not open for further replies.
To the contrary, the MBP is the standard that you will see on stages everywhere. I am also a decades long IT tech/security wonk/programmer who has automated many systems. So my frame of reference will be skewed compared to other guitarists.
I wonder if it's actually true that there are more Macs on world-class stages than Windows machines. Or how we could actually know.
 
So the industry standard is an absolutely unfocused device that has no particular single purpose but is instead a platform to do anything.

Awesome.
Industry standard for a computing device used by musicians in actual stadiums vs a new device with unproven feature creep. Nice try tho. Plenty more straws to grab.
 
Take Fractals setlist/song feature. The way it is currently implemented is bad and a waste of bytes. But it is there. So just finish it. Add ability to send out midi on song/song part select. Send/set tempo. Maybe run a midi track. Now it’s a very functional thing, easy to implement. Don’t limit the number of song parts by 6 - this doesn’t make any sense. Have storage? Add audio playback. Now you have a best in class backing track player with control for lights or whatever you can imagine with very little development effort.
This is not possible on current hardware.

The storage reserved for songs/setlists is exhausted. That's the reason it's limited...
 
Now you have a best in class backing track player with control for lights or whatever you can imagine with very little development effort.
This is not possible on current hardware.

The storage reserved for songs/setlists is exhausted. That's the reason it's limited...
So somewhere between "very little development effort" and "This is not possible". Got it.

Face it, unless you're an actual Fractal developer, you have no idea how much work your beautiful idea is, or if it's even feasible at all.
 
So somewhere between "very little development effort" and "This is not possible". Got it.

Face it, unless you're an actual Fractal developer, you have no idea how much work your beautiful idea is, or if it's even feasible at all.
Totally agree... Matt has posted about the lack of storage and not being able to make further changes.
 
Not a single user ever complained that reverbs aren’t good enough in Fractal products.
False. There were some of us that wanted better reverbs. Fractal iterated over the years on Reverb implementations until arriving at the latest iterations which are fantastic.
 
So somewhere between "very little development effort" and "This is not possible". Got it.
Little development, hardware upgrade required. The whole piece of discussion about “focus” and new generation devices. To me the way line 6 uses the new hardware for midi/backing tracks is focused enough, they develop new capabilities, enable new use cases, so the platform progresses.

Since on these systems resources like storage are a bottleneck, the choice of direction is important. And if the resources are spent on yet more betterer reverb tails that would be a bummer from my perspective.
 
There were some of us that wanted better reverbs.
Ah, so it’s your fault! :)


Fractal iterated over the years on Reverb implementations until arriving at the latest iterations which are fantastic.
Yeah, and to use these fantastic iterations in practice I need to turn the greatness down or off, or remove it from presets altogether so that it doesn’t break things like the pitch shifter. How “focused” is that?
 
I wonder if it's actually true that there are more Macs on world-class stages than Windows machines. Or how we could actually know.
Windows is also a general purpose platform which isn’t focused on playing backing tracks, or on doing anything other “one thing well”, for that matter.

One may argue that in the earlier days Macs were focused on creators, hence things like built in realtime audio engine, but their big success came when they dropped that and started appealing to broader audiences. Kinda like Line 6 :) They also tend to use aspirational marketing terms like Apple Intelligence to name features that are anything but, sometimes. :) Just like “Stadium”.

As a user of both systems, I very much prefer Apple hardware for music, but Windows as an OS. Can’t really have both though.
 
Little development, hardware upgrade required. The whole piece of discussion about “focus” and new generation devices. To me the way line 6 uses the new hardware for midi/backing tracks is focused enough, they develop new capabilities, enable new use cases, so the platform progresses.

Since on these systems resources like storage are a bottleneck, the choice of direction is important. And if the resources are spent on yet more betterer reverb tails that would be a bummer from my perspective.
For me, the same could be said about lighting control and backing tracks. Decisions are hard.
 
For me, the same could be said about lighting control and backing tracks. Decisions are hard.
There's no lighting controls, it's about sending midi out. This is important for many things apart from lighting.

Playing backing tracks is a dubious addition, but finishing the setlist/song functionality not so much, I think. When finished, that could control external backing track players with midi.

That's stuff that's already there, just kind of abandoned in the middle. Due to hardware blockers, they say. And I see quite a few questions and requests about it.

On the other hand, are you truly suffering from insufficiently good reverb tails? Have you been suffering from that ever on Fractal devices? Especially given that these better tails aren't even practically usable on 2 out of 3 Fractal devices.
 
As one who's gone heavy into Midi Translator Pro scripts to get my HD500 and MFC to do all kinds of cool stuff with Ax3 (to the point where FC would be a downgrade in several key respects for me), I was kinda bummed to see what looked to me like a restrictive set of available direct midi controllable functions in FC when it was introduced, compared to other units' foot switching that seem more open (ie - my old HD500 allows any/all of it's switches to transmit any midi, and, amazingly, I can send midi to any HD500 switch to control switch on/off state opening up all kinds of Ax3 switching possibilities via scripting). I understand tho, that providing more open direct midi capability in FC opens a bit of a support can of worms, but that maybe could be mitigated with a clear position of "if you go there, yur on yur own for "how to" type support (easier said than done I guess🤣). The other consideration I could see is that opening up FC midi a lot would probably require more safe guarding code to be deployed in FC as users would build all kinds of wild / wooly custom midi that might stress FCs functioning beyond what Fractal intends.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom