Hi guys,
Cliff owns a Tucana 3 and as of this week also a Triptik 50W (a lovely one in a gorgeous figured maple head cab actually). The Triptik originally modeled is the Axe was borrowed from a friend of mine and is actually a little modified. I drive Cliff nuts because I'll send him schematics, but I hand tweak each one, so when he opens his own up, it invariably different to the schematic. I do this so they all sound releatively similar and consistent. When you are building in the real world, you are dealing with hundreds of components that all have tolerances ranging from +/-1% to +/-20% as well as the effects of lead dress and the huge differences in tubes out there. So anyone who says they clone a Dumble or whatever because they are using identical components and values are generally missing the point totally. I cloned 5 Trainwrecks's for actual TW owners back in 2007. The owners sent me their amps to check out. I never opened up one of them. I just played them then recreated the tones I was hearing.
As most of you know Cliff owns many of the amps modeled in his products.
Firstly, the Tucana isn't a Dumble clone. The OD series amps are a bit closer to that thing, but still not clones. I've worked on a lot of Dumbles and they really aren't my thing. I'm British, I come more from the Marshall camp.
I play out live every week in a popular local cover band. I designed the original Tucana 1 model back in 2006 for myself. It was never ever meant to be a model in the CA lineup. But a few guys heard it and liked it so I added it and it to the lineup as a stand alone model or an ugrade to an OD2/3. I then updated it in 2010 to the Tucana 2 and more recently the Tucana 3. It's always been the flagship model and the one where I try out new ideas and designs that often also get included eventually in the other models.
The amp is meant for a gigging session player / cover band player /wedding band player. It's power, functions, ease of use, clarity of the front panel controls on a dark stage, biasmon circuit and wide array of tones make it a very useable 'live' model, just as it was always meant to be even before it was just my own amp.
To answer the question on the Axe taking away sales because it has a good emulation of the model....is about as far from the truth as you can get. They are different technologies and have different uses for different people. I use the amp in situations I wouldn't use an Axe and I use the Axre in situations its impossible to use the amp. All are part of my tool kit. I don't get in to the whole tube vs digital BS. Use whatever is the most suitable for your project. Right tool for the job. People who are hard left or hard right on the subject and generally not very experienced players in the real world......or simply forum trouble makers / haters.
Triptik is a great amp playing it alot today . Certainly nothing wrong with the Marshall side of things sound wise.
I agree just because you can buy the same parts maker and value does not mean the amp will sound good or remotely the same.
Case in point #5 Dumble SSS 150
I heard that amp alot when it first came to Texas and at many different live dates and in person at the rehearsal space.
at the Time Eric rented a room with Van Wilks behind the Austin Opery house.
When Eric moved into the bigger room I rented his old spot from Van.
Eric had the large room Vans room was next too that and Stevie Rays room was next over.
Not a bad place to be renting if you were chasing sounds..
Anyway The Big D amp caught fire or started smoking in the studio and stopped making sound
so it was taken to Rays to try to be fixed and they called Dumble while I was standing there
to ask him how to fix it I said he is not going to tell you and they said HUSH they called him and he
had the amp sent back to him to repair it.
Evidently that required replacing the boards and transfomer and when it came back it did not sound the same.
Likely for the very reason mentioned -+1 or 20 tolerances at play as well the amp was sold back in early 90s
not sure when Carlos bought it but by then it had new boards in it.
I asked Brandon how he dealt with the dark purple epoxy in the amp how did he remove it
to clone the amp and he said there never was any in the amp.
He repaired some caps and the phase inverter he said.
I said thats strange because the amp was fully epoxied when it broke down while Eric owned it.
That explains why the amp does not sound the same.
Now it should not be advertised as such considering what came back was not voiced for Eric
it had brand new boards and a different transformer.
Im pretty certain the tone went with the transformer and at the very least it did when all the parts
and the transformer were changed.
I felt the clone was ok I used it to record and made up some of my own creations using the black tool box.
I have to revisit the dry recordings to re adjust too 18 Ive been at setting levels all day long.
When I did that im certain I changed something initially so I have to pull the original recordings back up
and re adjust them too 18.
Doing all the level adjustments first that took most of the day.
The local music scene is rather dead around these parts
many clubs closed down over the past 3 years here..
Im told the clubs in Oklahoma dont want it real loud either
buddy of mine plays bass and is booked solid only Country gigs
some rock mostly Country and mostly at conversation level.
So From Dallas too Durant Oklahoma I see very tiny amps on stage
if at all its been getting worse over the past 4 years
as a single father who raised a son alone most of my time was spent raising him
some people have to work and raise kids others are more experienced in the club scene.
I spent the past 24 years raising kids and clubbing or rock bands were not part of my real world.
That said it never stopped me from playing or chasing sounds.
Im very pleased with fractal audios products.
I bought a few tube amps along the way and some I was not very pleased with so I sold them
and when you spend 6500 dollars on a tube amp it should be exactly as advertised.
I did and then I found out the amp was nothing like the original so I sold it back too the person that sold it too me
only for 1000 less.. used.
I sold it because I felt misled. Just sold it back too the guy who claimed to begin with it was just like Ejs amp.
Its not and I told him why its not which evidently spurred him into selling his other one. oddly he bought this one back
and sold it right away then after it was sold he claimed the amp was broken on arrival.
30 something days later.
I spoke to Brandon first he said the amp had been sold to someone else already then he said the reverb wire was loose
and it could just be plugged back in then he said 2 tubes had been broken in shipment.
I said thats an insurance claim and the person that bought the amp back used his fed ex account # to ship to himself
if the tubes broke he needs to file a claim.
Then Brandon stated the amp was dusty inside two tubes were broken I offered to send 100 dollars to clean the amp
of any dust and asked that the person that built the amp install new tubes and test the amp for a week
and put it up against his best personal amp if it sounded great then all is good proceed on and send the amp on.
Brandon refused and voided the warranty of the amp and then had the amp sent back too Texas and the charges reversed
too my ebay account. That closed my ebay account and my paypal account.
Brandon claims the amp is broken and will take 1200 dollars to clean the amp and that did not include the new tubes which
100 dollars would not buy.
So Thats the treatment if you buy a 6500 dollar amp and it gets broken in shipment.
I was contacted by ebay and told it was fine for me to ship this person his amp using HIS fed ex account
I overnighted the amp too him and did not hear from the guy again till 30 days later when Brandon called me
and was quite nasty.
I just turned it over too an attorney. Now I did not buy this amp from Brandon I bought it used
2nd owner and I sold it back too the same owner who sold it again. THEN 30 days later sent that to Brandon as
broken on arrival.
I just cant seem to get a solid answer as too what is broken on the amp or who got the amp broken
2nd owner Brandon 4th owner ?
I have no control over fed ex dropping the amp nor do I have any control over someone else buying it
and Brandon voiding the warranty.
Brandon told ebay the amp could kill someone if they tried to play it.
So I have no choice but to hand that over too an attorney.
Which I did.
If the very person that built the amp wont put 4 tubes in it and rebias it then who can ?
Brandon said he was not just going to turn the amp on.
I said of course not with broken tubes you should put 4 new tubes in it and bias it to test it.
When it works just fine ship it cause I know its not an Eric Johnson #5 1:1 clone
how do I know that ?
I saw the original on the bench and put my finger on the epoxy.
Brandon by his own words stated the amp never had any epoxy in it.
That means Dumble replaced the boards and transformer.
when Eric got the amp back it did not sound the same so he did not buy it again.
This could be cleared up by Brandon speaking to Eric directly about it
and just asking Eric did the Dumble you owned have epoxy on the boards ?
yes or no
if the answer is Yes as I know it is then
how can Brandon claim the amp he offers to the public for 6500 dollars is 1:1 exactly like what Eric owned ?
Thats impossible. If ebay has a policy that states the buyer is protected and if he or she finds that the item
is not as described then they shall get their money back.
I feel the amp was not advertised honestly so I sold it back now I had no idea when I bought the amp
that the boards were changed in the original I just bought the amp in good faith as it being an exact clone.
1:1 its not.
That being said do I not have the same rights as any one else on ebay ?
If I bought the amp off ebay which I did and found out later its not as advertised
then sold it back how am I now expected to buy the amp again ?
I have nothing against Brandon but I know the amp is not exactly 1:1 too Ejs SSS 150 #5
its not the same because the boards and transformer were changed after it burned up.
It never sounded the same.
I bought the amp once now they are trying to force me to buy it again.
so I just hired an attorney.
He can contact Eric Johnson first then Brandon and everybody can get
in the real world.
I told Brandon to contact Eric Directly and ask him
you think he did that ?
No But he voided the warranty on that amp
and told Ebay it might kill someone if they tried to play it.
Thats odd I played and recorded the amp the entire month and very day
it was shipped overnight and it was fine.
Im not dead or burned up from it but Brandon told ebay this.
Needless to say I dont want a bludotone amp and I dont have anything personal against Brandon
I just suggested he change the way he advertises the amp for sale so that others are not misled.
It appears other people are now building this same amp touting it as Eric Johnsons #5
which is laughable considering the original burned up.
Wait till they get letters regarding this..I think Brandons panties are all twisted up because others are competing with him
and in reality there is no such thing as an Ej #5 SSS amp anymore because the boards were changed by Dumble himself
as well the transformer and it was not voiced for Eric a 2nd time.
Monkey See Monkey do.
evidently Wellagan amps as well as Amplified nation are building Ej models.
Thats amazing isnt it considering Dumble has the original boards ?
How on earth can these guys claim this ? $$$$$$ ?
4000-6500 each thats how.
Dont drink the kool aid.