Orvillain
Power User
Then you're simply not reading your own posts. Go give 'em a read. They're a hoot!!That may be the dumbest thing I've read on this forum.
Then you're simply not reading your own posts. Go give 'em a read. They're a hoot!!That may be the dumbest thing I've read on this forum.
I think Cliff was referring to the engineers being in the US? It was a couple of pages ago, I may be misremembering that.Fractal are more bespoke, allegedly made in USA
It annoys me that there seems to be a chip on a lot of Fractal users about the Line 6 stuff - I'm a fan of Line 6 gear, I think they do a phenomenal job. Without question, a professional piece of kit, and anyone who says otherwise needs to sit down and think about their life choices.Sonically sure you can A/B HX Stomp and FM3 and it can be negligible... at times... (I have done this) but again something like Plex or some of the more macro things Fractal eviscerates everything, sorry dude to compare it to a car company/ car type.
Exactly, you got that Totally Right.That's why the device will have presets. Switch to a preset with Phaser. As this is a FAS product, it will have the "views/layouts" functionality as the rest of em.
Or just change the block in the current preset.
I totally agree! There are so many individual needs and each guitar player ist different. Some are fine with 4 Blocks others need 5 others 6. You can't anticipate every individual need or come with a range of 10 different products so everyone is happy.If you're so enamored with Line6 products and they do what you want, why are you here complaining about a Fractal product that doesn't do what you want?
It's not a product I need and as much as I love Fractal's stuff, I won't be buying it... But for many people this is exactly what they want.
Additionally, Cliff posted on The Gear Forum that he could envision adding another 2-4 "static" (always on) blocks per preset.
One of the best selling delay pedals ever made.I’ve always felt most of the Line 6 delays were unusable. I’ve never understood the love for the DL4
Now that would be very cool. If I was to get this unit and based on what little I truly know about it I was thinking one way it could be used is to make presets with 3 fx always in the same category and one more esoteric block and switch between these. This doesn’t even factor in other things like scenes, etc. which again I have to state is just unsubstantiated information. Also, there still the presets that could be totally atmospheric or not straight up bread and butter stuff.Additionally, Cliff posted on The Gear Forum that he could envision adding another 2-4 "static" (always on) blocks per preset.
Is there a chance that this lack of sales performance/market acceptance was due to it being ahead of its' time when originally released? The options available in today's marketplace for modeling configurations' topology with full modeling + FX at the top and FX only at the bottom is quite different than when the FX8 was originally introduced. But looking at so many configurations from all your competing companies, I also think modeling as a whole is now viewed quite differently, from the perspective of the musical community. Modeling now is the rage, where it wasn't 10 years ago.People didn't want it. It was the worst selling product in the history of the company.
Never had one but there used to be a period where every respectable guitar player had one on his pedal board. Even the Edge has one (but what doesn't he have)Besides the 2290P and fractal, no one else has created an accurate 2290 delay. I’ve always felt most of the Line 6 delays were unusable. I’ve never understood the love for the DL4
I suspect this is why this pedal is being released now.Is there a chance that this lack of sales performance/market acceptance was due to it being ahead of its' time when originally released? The options available in today's marketplace for modeling configurations' topology with full modeling + FX at the top and FX only at the bottom is quite different than when the FX8 was originally introduced. But looking at so many configurations from all your competing companies, I also think modeling as a whole is now viewed quite differently, from the perspective of the musical community. Modeling now is the rage, where it wasn't 10 years ago.
I remember when I did MI Retail in the early-2000's, NO ONE would entertain the viability of a powered PA speaker. Everyone wanted wood cabinets with separate power amps. A lot of companies had really good options for these that eventually phased out due to lack of sales, but those "failures" still pushed the market forward. Retail is like this everywhere. Remember the first time you saw someone wearing a new style of clothing? They look ridiculous until everyone else starts wearing them, and then it's commonplace. It just takes time.
As a result, I've always thought that the less than stellar performance of the FX8 was simply due to timing.
Imagine an electric car if it were introduced by GM in the early 90's when gas was $0.80/galllon.
It will be very interesting to see how the VP4 does, I think it will do quite well. I myself am concerned that 4 switches is very limiting to the overall market, but looking at the FM3's success, I hope to be wrong. I hope the VP4 does well enough, and there is enough push and justification for you to come out with a VP8 down the road, something closer to a modern FX8 with more foot switch options.
Which one?Never had one but there used to be a period where every respectable guitar player had one on his pedal board. Even the Edge has one (but what doesn't he have)
The sense of entitlement on display here is absolutely disgusting.So, why is it called a "virtual pedalboard"? Because it's *almost" one, but not quite?
I think the Line 6 DL4. It was popular and I guess still is although it never caught my eye. Then again I own(ed) a real TC2290 among other hi end delays. Definitely the Fractal time based fx are of top quality.Which one?
if you don’t play music with any subtlety or dynamics and don’t care that the delay and reverb all have a cluttered muddy quality to them, then sure. Otherwise you will notice immediately what that turd does to your signal. You lose the bloom and sag and get a cheap flattened representation of your signal instead.Or get a HXFX, get 9 fx, and pay $650
I have a suspicion a specific amount was just the age old craft of trolling. Why someone would feel the need to do this, I dont know. I can guess at a few reasons that I’ll keep to myself.There is a tremendous amount of judgement in this thread based on nothing but speculation… and the animosity about the varied opinions based on pure speculation is disheartening, but I guess that is a sign of the times we are in.
I’ll hold my judgement until I actually know the unit’s capabilities….
