Double tracking-effect on live guitar?

Spent some time with it today. It's hard to really do much, as a human, with test tones like that. Can you record some clean (like guitar -> pedal, no amp or cab) single note stuff for me maybe? A piano low E, mezzo piano low E, low E, mezzo forte low E, forte low E -- just hold each note for a few beats so we can hear the change over time?
It's probably not going to change. One of my first tests had the random changes even when not playing and it's something that sounds really weird.
 
Just as an FYI. I realized that you don't need two cabs. Just select one stereo cab block and pan each cab hard L and hard R. Make sure input is set to Stereo as well. This will save some much desired CPU. Still wondering if there is a way to do it w/one amp block. Not sure why the AMP blocks don't have the Stereo input option...I mean i understand in the real world...but this is the axe-fx we are talking about here. Anyways, thought i'd share.
 
This is my main heavy-rhythm sound for playin' live with the AX8. Just one amp block, the enhancer block and two different cabs. I gave it up with the mimiq pedal (it's back in the store)

 
My band just played their first gig and I used the MIMIQ pedal. I was unable to get a chance to hear what it sounded like out front but the consensus was that SOME of my heavier guitar parts were "hard to make out," but "...cleans sounded sensational"

I know it could be a number off things, but I am wondering what y'all do live? STEREO to FOH? MONO to FOH? ENHANCER block, no ENHANCER Block? Am wondering if the MIMIQ pedal was creating some tonal issues or phasing issues. Im the only guitarist so I'm trying to sound as big as possible.

Any specific feedback would be extremely helpful.

Here is a vid of the show. It is iPhone and GOPRO audio so not the best to make a decision from prob, but maybe it'll help.



 
So AMP (L+R=SUM) and CAB ULTRA-RES, and I can leave my Delays and REVERBs in stereo correct? Safe to use STEREO CAB BLOCK PANNED Hard L & R or is that not good idea?

I don't pan anything I just use the copy left -> right setting in the I/O output to make the L and R outputs mirrors of each and then I just don't sweat what happens to stereo effects (which i rarely use) in my signal chain.
 
I don't pan anything I just use the copy left -> right setting in the I/O output to make the L and R outputs mirrors of each and then I just don't sweat what happens to stereo effects (which i rarely use) in my signal chain.
Same here. For me the L+R Sum... When actually summer created phasing in some of my patches.
 
So what about bands like Periphery? I know, I know...they have Alex Markedis...and yes...its PERIPHERY. But in the show they pan Jake Hard L and Misha Hard R and Mark in center (or some variation of this). This is essentially double/triple tracking guitars live. Most every band does this w/two or more guitarists.

As the only guitarist i'm trying to achieve the same thing...two different amp blocks panned HARD L & R, one stereo CAB also panned HARD L & R and I use the MIMIQ pedal to achieve the double tracking effect. Can anyone explain why this does or doesn't work for live? I need to understand...lol otherwise its trial and error every show.

here is a reference for periphery
 
Do you also use different cabs? I don't mean different IRs from the same cab, but really two different models. At my last gig I just used one amp block, and IRs from two different cabs, that are similar in sound, but have a slightly different frequency curve. I put the enhancer block before the hard panned cabs and had (IMHO) a way better sound that I could have achieved with the mimiq pedal. I'm also the only guitarist in my band, but the sound on the PA was HUGE. No phase issues at all. The cabs were the key.
 
Do you also use different cabs? I don't mean different IRs from the same cab, but really two different models. At my last gig I just used one amp block, and IRs from two different cabs, that are similar in sound, but have a slightly different frequency curve. I put the enhancer block before the hard panned cabs and had (IMHO) a way better sound that I could have achieved with the mimiq pedal. I'm also the only guitarist in my band, but the sound on the PA was HUGE. No phase issues at all. The cabs were the key.

Interesting! No i haven't tried that but I definitely will. So your chain is AMP block (L+R=Sum) > ENHANCER > STEREO ULTRA-RES CAB (two diff cabs panned 100 L&R). Also, out of curiosity, how does FOH sound guy pan your guitars. Are they left down the center or are they also panned 100L&R? I switch back and forth from a wide rhythm to a centered Lead.

Thanks for the reply!
 
Do you also use different cabs? I don't mean different IRs from the same cab, but really two different models. At my last gig I just used one amp block, and IRs from two different cabs, that are similar in sound, but have a slightly different frequency curve. I put the enhancer block before the hard panned cabs and had (IMHO) a way better sound that I could have achieved with the mimiq pedal. I'm also the only guitarist in my band, but the sound on the PA was HUGE. No phase issues at all. The cabs were the key.

I just did some tests trying multiple methods from this thread. Your method is damn near identical (in terms of stereo field and sounding huge) to the MIMIQ...BUT, the MIMIQ has that extra sauce of giving you the sound of two performances (double tracked). So IMHO the best result is 2amps panned HARD L&R and a Stereo CAB also panning each IR hard L&R, and keeping the MIMIQ @1 Dub, fully tight, and effect/dry @100%.

I found that using two different amps and/or two different IR cab sims gives you the best results w/the MIMIQ pedal. This pedal seriously is just WICKED. When using same amp or cab it does some weird "phasing" thing which I think is bc it's trying to offset an identical signal so is very noticeable and "artificial" but give it two different signals and all problems are solved.

Here is the secret though...when giving the FOH your stereo signal make sure that FOH pans your guitars hard L&R. If FOH leaves your L&R centered, the MIMIQ pedal will put your signal out of phase and sound like complete ass...but turn the MIMIQ off and all sounds just fine bc you are back in MONO in phase. This is most likely what happened to me the other night, live and learn. I did my own FOH test here at home and immediately discovered that FOH panning is absolutely key.

I will upload some audio samples demonstrating exactly this, and also the comparison with the ENHANCER block instead of MIMIQ.

Cheers!
 
I created these to test how the TC electronic MIMIQ Pedal reacts in a live setting in various FOH panning situations.

In order to get an accurate FOH comparison/test you will need some kind of sound card to pan your L&R channels, unless of course your inputing to a STEREO IN instead of independent L&R channels. I'm using a Scarlett 18i20. Pan your inputs according to each sections title
(PANNED =HARD L&R 100%). If you don't have a sound card, thats ok, you can still here the differences between the MIMIQ and ENHANCER, but you will not be able to hear the OUT-OF-PHASE issues of the MIMIQ/PANNED. I'm happy to answer any questions.

Basically you need to become the FOH guy and treat each section as an INPUT from the guitar player on your board, mixer, sound card. Mess w/the panning and you'll see what i mean. HINT: If you have MONO/STEREO toggle capabilities then that will suffice)

 
Last edited:
Hi all, it's been 3 month and no updates on this thread... has anyone been able to improve on their setup with the MimiQ?
 
The only way to get that complete special fullness of double tracked guitar is to double track the guitar, or double your talent either or should work!
 
Hello all, lots of good information in this thread about doubling effects. I will be purchasing a new Axe this week, and one of the things it will hopefully be able to replicate/replace/improve on is the doubling effect I had on my Eventide. One of the things I don't think has been mentioned yet is that during real doubling, each guitar track or guitarist is either ahead or behind the other at any given moment. I reconstructed this by simply fixing a delay time of 7 ms on one side and sweeping the delay on the other from 0 to 20ms, 100% wet. Obviously this introduces latency, but I got used to it and didn't use it on every piece of music. The stereo effect was further enhanced by the fact that I had an EL34 Marshall JCM 800 on the right and another 6L6 800 on the left running into dummy loads as the inputs to the Eventide, which gave each amp its own tone and dynamics profile. This delay effect sounded phasey on some other devices I tried, but worked well on my H3000SE, I think because that unit had settings for the length of crossfade/splice between the changing delay times, which I optimized for smoothness/anti glitching, and which I have not seen in other units. Does anybody know if the Axe has settings for splice and crossfade on the delay blocks?.

The other thing I have not seen mentioned, is that the differences in pitch between two guitar passes or two guitarists playing at the same time, mostly come from the different picking dynamics from one take or guitarist to another, or from their fret hand grip, and whether they are sharp or flat on one or more strings as a result of either hand at any given moment. The best way to mimic this is obviously with an envelope follower of some sort, but then the questions become exactly what parameter should that LFO modify, to what degree and how to create those moments of fixed detuning which result during held notes, and which keep a doubled track from having that sweeping, 80's big production wash we get even from good rackmount modulation devices. My feeling is that the best pitch modulation would be something that mostly toggles, rather than sweeps between generated values, which I think would better mimic the momentary detuning between doubled parts with any held notes, or momemts of greater playing precision.

The last thing I want to mention, is that while I think it's cool that TC has come up with a doubling pedal, it's hard for me to believe that any pedal has as much headroom and general fidelity as a quality piece of rackmount gear. So I will be certainly trying to replicate all of the above phenomenon in the Axe, with all its CPU power and fidelity, as opposed to running my guitar through a pedal filled with 75 cent components. I thought the Mimiq sounded almost credible, but also a bit too clumsy and flabby. Surely the Axe can do better than that, right? I hope so!
 
For live you can use pitch block with +9 and -9. That's the max I like to go before it starts to sound like chorus. Or multi-delay and set tight ms settings to your liking. If you go too far it sounds fake.
But in a studio, just copy the guitar track to 1 or 2 other channels and pan l/r or l/c/r and eq each track a little differently.
 
Back
Top Bottom