Do you think the Legacy Cabs will become obsolete now that we have the Dyna Cabs?

[unix-guy]

seems a little more than that since 80% voted 'no'

Sorry, I was unclear. I was referring specifically to your last sentence.

I edited my post to be more clear.

I agree that I don't think Legacy IRs are going anywhere...

 

[GitGuy513]

seems a little more than that since 80% voted 'no'

Voting no and suggesting that DynaCabs are not a good thing are two different things. I voted no, but hardly use “Legacy” cabs anymore. Give it another year or two and that vote might change if asked again. This poll was initiated when they were first introduced.

 

[Joe Bfstplk]

The poll question and the choices it offers are kinda flawed and offers a false dichotomy, TBH....

 

[Joe Bfstplk]

Voting no and suggesting that DynaCabs are not a good thing are two different things. I voted no, but hardly use “Legacy” cabs anymore. Give it another year or two and that vote might change if asked again. This poll was initiated when they were first introduced.

I immediately started going through and replacing legacy IRs with in-box DynaCabs almost unilaterally, right away, as what would work for me was pretty well represented by the built-ins. Waiting for the ones I need to appear as CabLab4 DynaCabs now. Got the first four, and ones of the newer sets that work for my stuff.

So, needless to say, I will still be using legacy going forward as the CabLab4 DynaCabs that I need arrive....

 

[GitGuy513]

The poll question and the choices it offers are kinda flawed and offers a false dichotomy, TBH....

This why I tend to put the word legacy in quotes because I don't consider DynaCabs that are saved as User Cabs to be "Legacy".

...and yes if there is a next poll (which I'm not a big poll guy...hey now what did I just say ) it should be refined.