moo cow
Inspired
did you upgrade to 3.5?I did. No change.
did you upgrade to 3.5?I did. No change.
Yes, last March. Just now, I deinstalled Axe Edit, downloaded it fresh and reinstalled it. No change.did you upgrade to 3.5?
Although I appreciate your intention, what you're asking won't be fulfilled (technical reasons), but more importantly probably doesn't need to be fulfilled.
We have a tendency to expect to hear effects in the loop because that was how it was always done - but in the digital world, you can add it post-amp, and get all the benefits with none of the drawbacks.
I recommend adjusting your mindset to be comfy with chucking effects after the Amp block - sounds just as good!
Sorry but I call BS on this.
There are many people on this forum (myself included ) who would love the ability to put FX between preamp and poweramp. It's not the same as adding post-amp at all, particularly when you have a lot of poweramp breakup going on. Not that one is better than the other, they are just different - but if we are talking about 'realism' many classic in-built amp fx (reverbs, trems etc) were placed between pre and power amp. You may not 'need' it or think post-amp FX sound 'as good' but other people's tastes differ.
A send/receive block pair for in-amp FX would be awesome. I have no idea whether it's technically feasible.
But, anyway, I'm not holding out for it because I have enough awesomeness to cope with as it is. New firmware Fenders & Dumbles (which is pretty much all I use) sound fantastic. The gift keeps on giving.
Yes, last March. Just now, I deinstalled Axe Edit, downloaded it fresh and reinstalled it. No change.
True, but I think a send/receive is different than dedicated pre & power amp blocks. This might work, although I'm not sure how you would tell it how to route in the grid... maybe "amp" send/receive blocks like we have the rear panel send/receive blocks now?It's been mentioned numerous times that the preamp and power amp won't be separated !
True, but I think a send/receive is different than dedicated pre & power amp blocks. This might work, although I'm not sure how you would tell it how to route in the grid... maybe "amp" send/receive blocks like we have the rear panel send/receive blocks now?
That is pretty much what I had in mind. A send/receive block pairing like the current grid send/receive - anything between gets inserted between pre and power amp. I guess you'd need one of each for amp 1 and amp 2.
well, this is my first post and i have say the quantum 2 beta 2 was killer - i have the AXE 2 original about 4 years or so. - my amp to go was the Friedman an the best sounding version was quantum 2 beta 2 i don`t know what`s wrong in the final version?
yeah, i read that "there were no changing in the modeling" but maybe somewhere? i like the JS 410 to and this amp is not in the beta2 - i played a lone time the marshall 6100 with EL 34 and for the future updates i can`t stay with the beta
the JS amps were added. that does not mean the modeling was changed.yeah, i read that "there were no changing in the modeling" but maybe somewhere? i like the JS 410 to and this amp is not in the beta2 - i played a lone time the marshall 6100 with EL 34 and for the future updates i can`t stay with the beta
well, this is my first post and i have say the quantum 2 beta 2 was killer - i have the AXE 2 original about 4 years or so. - my amp to go was the Friedman an the best sounding version was quantum 2 beta 2 i don`t know what`s wrong in the final version?