peter_traj
Member
Hey Folks.
I don't gig, so i am speaking in the context of playing the axe at home and at reasonable levels. I have the ultra model and have hooked it's preamp stage (power amp OFF) up to a looper, together with the preamp stage of an Egnater Mod50 amp. So, i have a common power amplifier (the mod50 power stage) but i can toggle between 2 preamps (the axe-fx with its power stage OFF, and the Egnater preamps).
Basically, i am comparing preamps--not power stages (axe-fx "V" Egnater). I figure that, if the axe can replicate a "real" tube preamp, then half the battle is won, as a tube power amp can easily be attached to the axe (mesa 20/20, VHT 2502, etc, etc).
I have not yet tested the axe with a solid state power amp, so i cant comment on whether the axe, with its power stage simulator ON, can make a solid state amp sound "tube-like" (i will be testing this in the future though).
Now, if the axe can replace the preamps found in most popular amps (fender, marshall, mesa, etc), then the axe, together with a real tube power amp attached, will allow us to construct the most versatile rig ever!!! The effects in the axe, IMHO, match the quality of many analog stomp boxes. Together with the sounds of many popular amps, this makes for SUPER versatility, meaning, a multitude of different amps and effect sounds in the one box.
Before i continue, i want to say, that as far as i can hear, 2 different tube "power" amps (assuming the same power tubes are used in both ) do not sound as different as 2 different "pre"amps!!! What i mean is, that in my experience, the preamp "makes the sound" and power amp "makes that sound louder" (again, assuming the same power valves are used in each power amp). PLEEEEASE tell me if you agree/disagree with this statement as i am definitely not an authority on tone.
So, if we can replicate the "sounds" (preamp ones) of popular amps with the axe, then, and once married together with a suitable power amp, we can have all our favorite amp "sounds" in one box!!! What an amazing possibility.
Well, i am pleased to say that as far as my tests have gone, i have managed to replicate the sound of the following Egnater preamps (remember that the Egnater power amp is used as a common power amp):
1. DLX (Fender Deluxe)
2. TWN (Fender Twin)
3. SL2a/b (Marshall Plexi/Hot rod)
4. EG5 (Super high gain????)
Please, if anyone has done similar tests with tube preamps (Mrshall, Fender, mesa triaxis, ADA, CAE, etc), share your thoughts. As far as i am concerned, the axe gets so close to a tube pre amp that the difference is negligible (to my ears).
To those sitting on the AXE-FX fence who want "many" different amp sounds and effects, remember, that going analog requires a Fender clean, a Marshall crunch, a Marshall lead, a SUPER high gain channel, a reverb, digital delay, analog delay, compressor, noise suppressor, chorus, phaser etc, all the sounds that the axe covers (even if they are not 100% accurate--80% is barely discernible from 100% to my eras). Plus, the massive routing chain to switch between all those analog amps and pedals will surely have some effect on your tone.
However, those on the axe-fx fence that only want 1 or 2 different sounds (clean/dirty and a bit of reverb or delay), don't bother buying an axe at all. Just get a fender deluxe reissue, a ts808 pedal, a lee jackson reverb, and an Maxon AD-9 delay and be happy.
The axe-fx is all about "VERSATILITY" IMHO. If you are happy with 80% of the sound that it proposes to replicate, then you will be 100% happy with the axe. If not, then buy a new house to store all the "100%" amps and effects that the axe-fx can do 80% well--good luck.
Cheers, and please reply
I don't gig, so i am speaking in the context of playing the axe at home and at reasonable levels. I have the ultra model and have hooked it's preamp stage (power amp OFF) up to a looper, together with the preamp stage of an Egnater Mod50 amp. So, i have a common power amplifier (the mod50 power stage) but i can toggle between 2 preamps (the axe-fx with its power stage OFF, and the Egnater preamps).
Basically, i am comparing preamps--not power stages (axe-fx "V" Egnater). I figure that, if the axe can replicate a "real" tube preamp, then half the battle is won, as a tube power amp can easily be attached to the axe (mesa 20/20, VHT 2502, etc, etc).
I have not yet tested the axe with a solid state power amp, so i cant comment on whether the axe, with its power stage simulator ON, can make a solid state amp sound "tube-like" (i will be testing this in the future though).
Now, if the axe can replace the preamps found in most popular amps (fender, marshall, mesa, etc), then the axe, together with a real tube power amp attached, will allow us to construct the most versatile rig ever!!! The effects in the axe, IMHO, match the quality of many analog stomp boxes. Together with the sounds of many popular amps, this makes for SUPER versatility, meaning, a multitude of different amps and effect sounds in the one box.
Before i continue, i want to say, that as far as i can hear, 2 different tube "power" amps (assuming the same power tubes are used in both ) do not sound as different as 2 different "pre"amps!!! What i mean is, that in my experience, the preamp "makes the sound" and power amp "makes that sound louder" (again, assuming the same power valves are used in each power amp). PLEEEEASE tell me if you agree/disagree with this statement as i am definitely not an authority on tone.
So, if we can replicate the "sounds" (preamp ones) of popular amps with the axe, then, and once married together with a suitable power amp, we can have all our favorite amp "sounds" in one box!!! What an amazing possibility.
Well, i am pleased to say that as far as my tests have gone, i have managed to replicate the sound of the following Egnater preamps (remember that the Egnater power amp is used as a common power amp):
1. DLX (Fender Deluxe)
2. TWN (Fender Twin)
3. SL2a/b (Marshall Plexi/Hot rod)
4. EG5 (Super high gain????)
Please, if anyone has done similar tests with tube preamps (Mrshall, Fender, mesa triaxis, ADA, CAE, etc), share your thoughts. As far as i am concerned, the axe gets so close to a tube pre amp that the difference is negligible (to my ears).
To those sitting on the AXE-FX fence who want "many" different amp sounds and effects, remember, that going analog requires a Fender clean, a Marshall crunch, a Marshall lead, a SUPER high gain channel, a reverb, digital delay, analog delay, compressor, noise suppressor, chorus, phaser etc, all the sounds that the axe covers (even if they are not 100% accurate--80% is barely discernible from 100% to my eras). Plus, the massive routing chain to switch between all those analog amps and pedals will surely have some effect on your tone.
However, those on the axe-fx fence that only want 1 or 2 different sounds (clean/dirty and a bit of reverb or delay), don't bother buying an axe at all. Just get a fender deluxe reissue, a ts808 pedal, a lee jackson reverb, and an Maxon AD-9 delay and be happy.
The axe-fx is all about "VERSATILITY" IMHO. If you are happy with 80% of the sound that it proposes to replicate, then you will be 100% happy with the axe. If not, then buy a new house to store all the "100%" amps and effects that the axe-fx can do 80% well--good luck.
Cheers, and please reply