SmokinHalfNote
Inspired
No one is ever happy.
Just wanted to prove you right.
No one is ever happy.
What will really get all of us pissed is if FAS raises the price because of this dumb thread.
It seems the smartest thing for the release is just put it out there for sale without all the debacle mystery of the FX8 and let buyers start the process. If it gets released before the now infamous "H", then Fractal will end up reaping more sales than expected. After all, business is about making money with supply and demand. Let the sales commence!!!!
I don't think the AX8 will be as nice for the 4cm method as the FX8. I think the AX8 is geared toward FRFR users and FX8 is geared toward amp users. Not so much competing products but complimentary products.
I'm really curious about this too, as one of the first FX8 buyers. Cliff never mentioned anything about "aggressive pricing" regarding FX8 prior to it's launch. He did say that (or similar) about AX8.
Also, the FX8 was originally going to be built 100% in China, but at the last minute due to some kind of quality issues it was finished in the USA. Not sure of details, but as I recall the FX8 price wasn't announced til after that all happened.
Now I don't think we know where the AX8 is made, do we? If they sorted out the quality issues in China and it was made there it could be cheaper than we expect.
I don't know, but I would think the fx8 is (more) for playing thru an amp, right? ax8 , with preamps, why would you want to run preamps thru an pre amp. I think if someone buys the fx8 it's because they like their amp and the sound.
we still have "no real idea" of a direct comparison between the 2--- I thought we were just speculating here?
No one is ever happy.
I don't think it's going to have the processor power to do everything the FX8 can do AND do amp and cab modeling. I haven't seen the spec sheet as far as what processor it will have, and how much memory yet, but I believe that, just like the Axe-FX II, it was designed first for the FRFR and direct recording crowd, and the FX8 was built for use with amps. Unless the processor is significantly higher (and/or a dual processor unit) then there's no way you can get those amp and cab emulation without sacrificing something somewhere.Maybe not as nice and no relays, but if it can do everything?
You really think this thread is going to have any impact on the price? I don't.
I also don't think the thread is dumb, though some responses may be.
I don't think it's going to have the processor power to do everything the FX8 can do AND do amp and cab modeling. I haven't seen the spec sheet as far as what processor it will have, and how much memory yet, but I believe that, just like the Axe-FX II, it was designed first for the FRFR and direct recording crowd, and the FX8 was built for use with amps. Unless the processor is significantly higher (and/or a dual processor unit) then there's no way you can get those amp and cab emulation without sacrificing something somewhere.
Bottom line... we can all sit around speculating on the specs and price, or we can wait patiently for when that information becomes available. And that will be...
wait for it...
Soon!
I thought it was common knowledge here that the AX8 will have two of the Sharc processors with one dedicated to amp/cab and the other dedicated to effects.
I'll get upset if it's more than $1699.99 :mrgreen
No one is ever happy.
If the FX8 and AX8 and both pretty much the same price. Why would someone purchase the FX8?
Where did you read that? Was FAS? I haven't read that anywhere-I'd like to read this if you can point me to the fractal post about this. Also, I would love it if this were factual and I am not saying it is or isn't---.