As I understand it, it's a lack of memory, not processing power. Processor usage is determined by what you put into your patch. Many people's patches leave plenty of processing power to spare.Something lik eyou suggest will take up more processing power to make happen - and thats what the gen 1 modells are lacking now
FAS only needs to free some space in the flash mem. Thus dump some things we hardly use and fill this space with new exiting stuff. They promissed life time updates so arrange it FAS.
If you can't already get what you want from your Gen 1 Axe-Fx, you should consider looking elsewhere. The tools are there right now, and they have been there for years. The name on an amp sim is just that: a name. It's a starting point, not a destination. Rather than beg for some more amp names in the firmware, I suggest you work with what's already there with the goal in mind of producing the sounds you want to hear. If you get stuck, you can put a request for help in the "Share and Request Patches" forum. That's why it's there.
FAS supports its products. The results you get from them depend on how well you support your own efforts.
FAS only needs to free some space in the flash mem. Thus dump some things we hardly use and fill this space with new exiting stuff.
If you can't already get what you want from your Gen 1 Axe-Fx, you should consider looking elsewhere. The tools are there right now, and they have been there for years. The name on an amp sim is just that: a name. It's a starting point, not a destination. Rather than beg for some more amp names in the firmware, I suggest you work with what's already there with the goal in mind of producing the sounds you want to hear. If you get stuck, you can put a request for help in the "Share and Request Patches" forum. That's why it's there.
FAS supports its products. The results you get from them depend on how well you support your own efforts.
If you can't already get what you want from your Gen 1 Axe-Fx, you should consider looking elsewhere. The tools are there right now, and they have been there for years. The name on an amp sim is just that: a name. It's a starting point, not a destination. Rather than beg for some more amp names in the firmware, I suggest you work with what's already there with the goal in mind of producing the sounds you want to hear. If you get stuck, you can put a request for help in the "Share and Request Patches" forum. That's why it's there.
FAS supports its products. The results you get from them depend on how well you support your own efforts.
Then why have you an axe-II ?.
There's more to the axe-II than more models, right?
I have no need of them. When I am playing live, I am already in a room. Adding a simulated one would only make matters worse. When I record direct, I have always been able to get satisfactory "in the room" sounds with the reverb block in the Standard. As unconventional as it may appear, I only expect the cab sim to work for, well, simulating cabinets. With my IRs, the one in the Gen I units does very well at that task.Ok Jay, sorry. What do you think about the room/size controls ?
I have no need of them. When I am playing live, I am already in a room. Adding a simulated one would only make matters worse. When I record direct, I have always been able to get satisfactory "in the room" sounds with the reverb block in the Standard. As unconventional as it may appear, I only expect the cab sim to work for, well, simulating cabinets. With my IRs, the one in the Gen I units does very well at that task.