Dr. Dipwad
Experienced
Jimmy,
What the Washington Post said was:
...and elsewhere, agsin writing in the Washington Post, Morrison states:
Now, if the reduction to the NSC sidecar-groups had not merely consolidated them organizationally, but had also "let go" the biodefense staff, it seems the accusation "dismantled" would be warranted. But it looks like this was a change to the "org chart" rather than a removal of positions.
That's a more complex story, but the Post was willing to tell it, and I don't think of them as terribly fond of the current admin.
With others, however, I'm concerned about this thread going political.
Better, I think, that it remain practical.
Um, that's not how I understood the events to have played out.Oh - you mean the task force that was completely dismantled upon taking office?
What the Washington Post said was:
But according to Tim Morrison, the former aide to whom direction of this office was assigned, the office was not “dissolved.” It remains in operation under Morrison’s successor.
...and elsewhere, agsin writing in the Washington Post, Morrison states:
(emphasis added)When I joined the National Security Council staff in 2018, I inherited a strong and skilled staff in the counterproliferation and biodefense directorate. This team of national experts together drafted the National Biodefense Strategy of 2018 and an accompanying national security presidential memorandum to implement it; an executive order to modernize influenza vaccines; and coordinated the United States’ response to the Ebola epidemic in Congo, which was ultimately defeated in 2020.
It is true that the Trump administration has seen fit to shrink the NSC staff. But the bloat that occurred under the previous administration clearly needed a correction. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, congressional oversight committees and members of the Obama administration itself all agreed the NSC was too large and too operationally focused. . . .
The reduction of force in the NSC has continued since I departed the White House. But it has left the biodefense staff unaffected — perhaps a recognition of the importance of that mission to the president, who, after all, in 2018 issued a presidential memorandum to finally create real accountability in the federal government’s expansive biodefense system.
Now, if the reduction to the NSC sidecar-groups had not merely consolidated them organizationally, but had also "let go" the biodefense staff, it seems the accusation "dismantled" would be warranted. But it looks like this was a change to the "org chart" rather than a removal of positions.
That's a more complex story, but the Post was willing to tell it, and I don't think of them as terribly fond of the current admin.
With others, however, I'm concerned about this thread going political.
Better, I think, that it remain practical.
Last edited: