Thanks - I can see the Overdrive volume control on the FM9 screen and it defaults to 5 (the same as the Master Volume). If I turn it upto 10 the block volume is about the same as the other amp models. So are the default values too low?
Thanks - I can see the Overdrive volume control on the FM9 screen and it defaults to 5 (the same as the Master Volume). If I turn it upto 10 the block volume is about the same as the other amp models. So are the default values too low?
Do you have the latest FM9 editor that was released yesterday ?
The default values are arbitrary. When you use the real amp there is no "default value". You adjust the knobs until you get the sound you want. No difference with the amp models.Thanks - I can see the Overdrive volume control on the FM9 screen and it defaults to 5 (the same as the Master Volume). If I turn it upto 10 the block volume is about the same as the other amp models. So are the default values too low?
Thanks so much, DP! I've been trying to work out some W/D and W/D/W presets and wasn't completely happy with how I handling the separation of the effects.That did it. Here you go @Angry Buzzy
For anyone wanting to try this, keep in mind it's at 84.9% CPU on my FM9T lol
Edit: it's also very much a work in progress. Scenes are named but not dialed in, etc.
Edit 2: I also have it setup to play through my entire setup right now which includes my studio monitors which are just stereo AND my three FRFRs. This means the mixer blocks aren't tweaked to be ideal for either of those two "systems". My plan is to save one preset for use with the FRFRs and one for use with the monitors. The cool thing is that you can easily just use the single preset for either system or both by just dialing in the mixer blocks appropriately. Output 1 goes to my pair of PXMs and my studio monitors; Output 2 goes to my FR-12. That may seem a little backward if just looking at the picture of the preset, but the routing and mixer blocks allow me to mix as much wet or dry signal as I want into either of the outputs. I got this idea from @GreatGreen
Edit 3: Lol...now it is at 84.9% occasionally hitting 85% and generating the warning. Fine, I just deleted the Multi-Delay block and it's down to a very comfortable 74% now. That's the "take 2" version.
Edit 4: Seems that little CPU bump to 85% was generated because the Multitap Delay block was set on Space Tape. When I set it back to my normal Aurora Delay setting it went back down to 83.7%.
They weren't really in one release. There were many private releases too.
Odds are good with more eyes on it in open beta we'll find a couple more, but it's really solid as is.
Consider a situation where the changes have to be incorporated into a different architecture, and they come in at the rate that Cliff delivers them, and that they were being delivered over the holidays when people were out of the office and/or sick.follow a flow more like the AXE FX III with rapid smaller updates.
Would be great, i'm in the same caseIs/will cab smoothing be supported on FM9?
I have both fxIII and FM9 (which is travelling with me) and keep patches synced in between. If I can't use smoothing on FM9 then I can't use it on fxIII either.
Is/will cab smoothing be supported on FM9?
I have both fxIII and FM9 (which is travelling with me) and keep patches synced in between. If I can't use smoothing on FM9 then I can't use it on fxIII either.
Yes i tonematched the smoothed ir in order to use it in fm9.External IRs? Smoothen them in Cab-Lab.
I don’t know if this has been discussed before. Probably? I’d check to see if there is a feature request thread for the feature you can vote on. Otherwise, you can create a separate feature thread.Is/will cab smoothing be supported on FM9?
I have both fxIII and FM9 (which is travelling with me) and keep patches synced in between. If I can't use smoothing on FM9 then I can't use it on fxIII either.
No it's not min phaseI don’t know if this has been discussed before. Probably? I’d check to see if there is a feature request thread for the feature you can vote on. Otherwise, you can create a separate feature thread.
However, as @yek said you can smooth them in Cab-Lab 4. Even with the DynaCab Packs. I believe the option is “Min Phase” next to the output format.
My mistake. I guess it is a more manual process of aligning. I do connect Cab-Lab 4 to my FM9 and process as UltraRes and Min Phase. Then I adjust my mic alignment to taste. However, it works great! Then it is all baked into the IR and you get the benefit on any of the systems.No it's not min phase
I’ve always used the ods clean with the master volume a nearly max position.Thanks - I can see the Overdrive volume control on the FM9 screen and it defaults to 5 (the same as the Master Volume). If I turn it upto 10 the block volume is about the same as the other amp models. So are the default values too low?
Yes... It uses up to about 1.5-2% more CPU, I believe.Gapless question. Sorry if it's a repeat. Is there any reason not to use gapless? Does it eat some CPU?
I can see there are options within gapless, all vs scenes...
I welcome any thoughts.