Show me the peer reviewed journal article in the tier 1 scientific publication that states that. Otherwise, don’t drag this out until the eventual heat death of the universe.
Why the condescending tone? Who’s dragging anything out lol.
I commented on some responses properly.
I replied to the post with what modern science postulates and holds today at the present moment.
It’s seems you are attempting to turn the narrative into confrontational rhetoric.
The poster’s question is the topic …I’ve responded.
Cordial discussion and dialog is expected. Yes?
fyi….there is no “peer reviewed” papers for any cosmological model nor theory …including the Big Bang lambdaCDM Standard Model.
The reason no peer reviewed for the Big Bang is it’s missing 96% of the theory! Dark Energy & Dark Matter. They been searching for these for over 50 years and to this day nary a whimper. They are still holding onto it because of other evidence but those evidence can be attributed to other causes other than a Big Bang. Hence again …no peer review
fyi….Einstein’s Relativity Theories have no peer reviewed papers.
Why? It’s similar in situation to the Big Bang theory. They’re theories that have other qualities that have yet to be discovered and proven. …hence no peer review. They however supposedly discovered 1 recently ….gravitational waves.
All they have are like pieces of puzzle evidence but missing massive puzzle parts. Again…hence no peer review.
Yet….they are all taught not as theories but as fact.
And you are demanding peer review lol
The scientific empirical evidence that literally obliterates the standard model are numerous and documented by several universities and other scientific organizations. (Hence again why no peer review for the Big Bang?)
But that is not the subject of this post and will hijack the thread.
Again the poster’s question as others recently has qualities of a loaded question.
It’s similar to “Why are we here?” & “What is the purpose of life?”
Answering the questions is bordering on breaking forum rules.
Everyone on the thread are walking on thin ice with such questions.
If one wishes to lock a thread all they simply need to do is show being offended and bait nasty exchanges.
I’m sticking with scientific empirical evidence.