Its an interesting Graph, at 2 points "the other things" performs better than the Axe Fx II and at 20K the II performs better.
No, the stuff at 20K is desired signal. That's 2nd-order distortion.
Its an interesting Graph, at 2 points "the other things" performs better than the Axe Fx II and at 20K the II performs better.
just save the picture and you'll know which competitor it is.Now I’m curious which competitor was used in the comparison. But this also just pumped me up even more for the release of the III. My credit card is ready and waiting for that email.
So, given that there are no frequencies above nyquist, why is the aliasing at all? I guess I should study up, eh?
What causes the bump at 180Hz just out of curiosity?
Aha!Ground loop. 3 x 60 Hz.
I keep reading the words over and over, and one day I’ll comprehend it.
Ahhhhh!!!!! You crazy genius dude!!! So, why not increase the sample rate? Wouldn't increasing to 96k or 192kprevent any aliasing at all? Does that cause other issues making it not worthwhile?
Ahhhhh!!!!! You crazy genius dude!!! So, why not increase the sample rate? Wouldn't increasing to 96k or 192kprevent any aliasing at all? Does that cause other issues making it not worthwhile?
Why?for sure he'll not release any comparison with his own devices. this could only be negative.
i've been working with the II and III a lot lately for testing. i know there's all this technical stuff explaining what's going on, but i don't know that stuff too well. all i know is that playing the III definitely FEELS great and sounds even "clearer" if that makes any sense.I’m curious to hear this. If I a/b the III and other devices is it very noticeable? (when I get one of course)