It’s been answered many times.Also very curious if the MFC101 mk1 can still be used with the Axe III? Many here have asked but I haven’t seen an answer.
Thanks Andrew, I saw that graph. Also the text that says "These processors are the most powerful DSPs available delivering over twice the performance of the DSPs used in our previous generation products."
I guess I was just wondering aloud if anyone had more background or specifics about these DSPs. I mean, if the Keystones are really that much more powerful, why was the Axe-FX using the TigerSHARCs?
The same way a Bugatti Veyron looks toyish...
There is no better digital modeler on planet earth than the Axe III.
Even my massive, over-kill effects blocks presets I've put into the beta unit I have for testing haven't reached 80% yet. I put in the pedalboard rig from hell, and still had plenty of power left over. You could do gigs with ONE preset using the 8 scenes per preset (you can name them!), with multiple amps in a preset no problem.
You can get get FOUR amp channels in a single amp block. They switch gap-lessly. 2048 new factory cabs over the 189 we have now (plus we keep the old ones too as legacy ones), and you can mix up to four in a single cab block.
It's awesome, no better tool to sculpt tones!
My biggest question is if the effects section will also be improved in the Axe III? I read that the pitch detection was better and some changes to the delay are made. If the effects will be improved I want one. If the effects are more or less the same and only the storage and power is improved I think I will stay with my Axe II for now.
Oh man! I want but don't need! Tempted!
I don't like it's 3 rack spaces.
Edit: I'm on the waitlist, bring it on!
Send back. Exact happened to me with ultra and 2I recieved my axe fx today...is not possible