With the wafers used for RAM being gobbled up by AI...I wonder how this will affect Fractal and the Axe Fx 3 and possible 4?

I LOVED that show. Straker was the man.
It was very cool at the time - and the moon base command center ladies' uniforms were quite eye catching for a young lad in 1970! :flushed: + those futuristic tape machines attracted me to pursue DP! ("Data Processing"!) on the mighty IBM 370>3xx series mainframes (I feel old 👴, very old in the new land of AI 🤣 )
 
Last edited:
All this work trying to make better, smarter machines. It's a shame we gave up on making better, smarter humans.
We've largely given up on systematically making better, smarter humans, not because it's impossible, but because large parts of society (and especially those in power) actively don't want to. A population that is sharper, more independent-minded, better at reasoning, and less susceptible to manipulation is a population that's harder to control, harder to sell things to, harder to scare into compliance, and harder to keep voting against its own interests. Truly educated, critical-thinking humans threaten entrenched interests in ways that even the most advanced AI never will—because AI, no matter how capable, remains a tool that ultimately serves its owners and operators. So we pour billions into making machines smarter while deliberately, drowning people in misinformation, optimizing media for outrage over understanding, and designing systems that reward conformity and short-term thinking.

It's not an accident; it's a feature.
 
Holy crap; I've never heard of this; it was like a mod Star Trek, but with a lot of just casually walking around futuristic command centers. Wait, I guess I'm really just describing Star Trek.
The original Star Trek was the gold standard back then (I still prefer it to all the other S.T. series). My fav episode to this day, is the one with Joan Collins, where Kirk/Spock find themselves back in time (1930s) and Kirk inadvertently intervenes in history by saving Joan's character from a car accident - needless to say, Spock has to figure out how to set historical events back correctly so that the future is not destroyed.
 
Last edited:
Looks more like 'Thunderbirds' to me :D

Gerry Anderson did both I think?
lol! Ya!, some of their vehicles look very Thunderbirdish - maybe they got them on sale from Thunderbirds' storage! lol!

No AI here - 100% Analogue 🤣
 
Last edited:
AI is the latest industry tech bubble and will likely implode IMO, just as I suspect "quantum computing" will. There is no use to shove "AI stuff" into every widget and procedure; a lot of marketing and things that will provide no real utility at the end of the day. It can, and does, do amazing things but in many ways, the current tech can reduce to really advanced statistics.

I thought it interesting when a researcher described a lot of AI as "just a really complicated math function, where you may have thousands of input and output variables and the system, via gradient decent and back-propagation, etc., "solves" the function". Skynet/M5/HAL9000 isn't even close.

This all cannot work without gobs and gobs of data...data is the oil for the machine. Data, and privacy, is more important then ever going forward.

It's interesting seeing the Star Trek references here; I'm currently reading "Star Trek TOS - These Are The Voyages" books (3 books, one for each season, ~700 pages each; true TOS Star Trek nerd stuff here big time) and they deep dive into how they developed the various themes, and one of the main ones that Roddenberry spent a lot of effort and time on was the "man-vs-AI" theme in several of the first season episodes:

Court Martial: AI vs Humans: Kirk accuser is a computer....man vs machine.

The Return Of The Archons: AI vs Humans: Beings/society controlled by a master computer (Landru)

A Taste Of Armageddon: AI vs Humans: Beings/society controlled by a master computer but that computer is controlled by them (they can shut it off, but Anan7 didn't have the nerve)

Phones/social media addictions, cameras everywhere, fake AI vids/content everywhere, etc., we are somewhere between Anan7 and Landru heh.
 
Last edited:
The original Star Trek was the gold standard back then (I still prefer it to all the other S.T. series). My fav episode to this day, is the one with Joan Collins, where Kirk/Spock find themselves back in time (1930s) and Kirk inadvertently intervenes in history by saving Joan's character from a car accident - needless to say, Spock has to figure out how to set historical events back correctly so that the future is not destroyed.

Whenever my wife and I walk past an archway that looks remotely like the time portal in that episode, one of us asks the other if a doomed Joan Collins is on the other side.
 
THIS! I read a facebook post that said instead of making smarter artificial intelligence....why don't we work on making human intelligence smarter? Makes sense.
We've been making "human intelligence smarter" for a while with public education, expanding girls' access to school, and massive public investments in research universities, community colleges, and public/private partnerships. There are very specific politics at work that have tried, with varying success, to reverse these trends, though.
 
It's not. Those are quotation marks. These are parentheses: ()
Yup, my bad. I was distracted. Meant quotation marks. Question still stands - I'm curious why it was in quotes, and the other point about anti-eugenics propaganda which seemed odd. But maybe I'm just misreading the post.
 
We've been making "human intelligence smarter" for a while with public education, expanding girls' access to school, and massive public investments in research universities, community colleges, and public/private partnerships. There are very specific politics at work that have tried, with varying success, to reverse these trends, though.

My concerns are with the low literacy rates coming out of US public schools despite the high spending per student. I don’t see it changing anytime soon and AI isn’t going to help that either. I don’t think we’re making human intelligence smarter, I see it moving in the opposite direction.
 
Yes, but if not for public education, you would not have known that. Or, was is it research university?

My concerns are with the low literacy rates coming out of US public schools despite the high spending per student. I don’t see it changing anytime soon and AI isn’t going to help that either. I don’t think we’re making human intelligence smarter, I see it moving in the opposite direction.
Agree on that, but I was speaking more globally and historically re: universal education. The US is certainly not doing great with investment in education the last couple of decades.
 
My concerns are with the low literacy rates coming out of US public schools despite the high spending per student. I don’t see it changing anytime soon and AI isn’t going to help that either. I don’t think we’re making human intelligence smarter, I see it moving in the opposite direction.

AI is convincing these young people to live above their parent's garage like Fonzie.
 
My concerns are with the low literacy rates coming out of US public schools despite the high spending per student. I don’t see it changing anytime soon and AI isn’t going to help that either. I don’t think we’re making human intelligence smarter, I see it moving in the opposite direction.
It doesn't matter how much you spend on education if those funds never make it into programs and teachers that do the actual educating. Teaching is one of the most underpaid professions here, when compared to its inherent value to society. Frankly, we treat our teachers like s--t and tie their hands behind their backs while parents avoid any actual parenting. Hearing stories from K-12 teachers over the past couple years sounds more like a warzone than a classroom. The problems with education go way deeper than just how much money we're sinking into it.
 
Back
Top Bottom