Am I wasting my time and chasing something that I will never achieve?
For recording the Axe AX has been great. For live use not so great. I have an Axe FX II XL, Matrix GT1000FX, Port City 2 x 12 with Celestion V Types. Cab Sims Off, Power Amp Sims on. I am an experienced guitarist and live sound engineer. I have used many amps over the years. For some reason I cannot get the Axe FX to deliver (in a live band setting) a truly realistic sound no matter what I do. Eg: A basic 65 Bassguy preset I created sounded great on a recording. Tweaked it in my music room at home for live use (using my live rig). Sounded pretty ok I thought. Rehearsed with the band, it sounded thin; lacked something. Spent hours the next day tweaking it and also dialled in a JTM45 preset and an AC30 TB preset. Went to the next band rehearsal thinking I'd got it right. Sounded worse than first rehearsal. Thin and artificial. Spent two more days tweaking. Scraped the Bassguy and AC30 presets. Spent ages tweaking the JTM and also created a Badger 30 which sounded better than any of the others. In fact in my music room the Badger 30 preset sounded good and almost the sound I was looking for. Soundchecked for a gig... again it sounded thin and artificial. Tweaked it following soundcheck based on what I heard and didn't like during soundcheck. Used it for the gig. Still missing something.
Is this device always going to sound thin and somewhat artificial? There is something lacking. Warmth? Dynamics? I don't know. Is a tube power amp with amp sims disabled the answer? I have tried FRFR which sounds even more artificial to me in a live setting. Am I missing something? I play 80s, 90s rock/pop covers on a Fender Strat, Les Paul and Bill Lawrence Tele. Whilst the Axe FX certainly provides the versatility I've been yearning for I just cannot get a truly realistic sound out of it. Maybe I'm trying to achieve something that's not possible, but given the hype and reviews I thought this device was going to be the answer I've been looking for.
I'm looking for and am interested in others' views and thoughts.
Help!
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Update...
Thanks for all the responses and assistance. I've did try FRFR using the passive Atomic CLR/Matrix GT1000. Don't go through FOH at smaller gigs, which is one of the reasons I went for the Matrix option. I A/B'd FRFR (with cab sims) vs Guitar Cab (without) and found I got a better and more realistic sound with the later. Have spent today trying to get my rig to sound more 'realistic' without that 'digital' sound I keep hearing. After hours and hours it still sounds somewhat artificial to me. (NB: I did set my presets at gig type volume with backing tracks and as mentioned above re-checked at rehearsals and soundcheck.) Something's just not working for me.
Here are the presets I used. Very straight forward. Rhythm sounds on Scenes 1 & 2, lead sounds on Scenes 4 & 5.
Any more thoughts?
For recording the Axe AX has been great. For live use not so great. I have an Axe FX II XL, Matrix GT1000FX, Port City 2 x 12 with Celestion V Types. Cab Sims Off, Power Amp Sims on. I am an experienced guitarist and live sound engineer. I have used many amps over the years. For some reason I cannot get the Axe FX to deliver (in a live band setting) a truly realistic sound no matter what I do. Eg: A basic 65 Bassguy preset I created sounded great on a recording. Tweaked it in my music room at home for live use (using my live rig). Sounded pretty ok I thought. Rehearsed with the band, it sounded thin; lacked something. Spent hours the next day tweaking it and also dialled in a JTM45 preset and an AC30 TB preset. Went to the next band rehearsal thinking I'd got it right. Sounded worse than first rehearsal. Thin and artificial. Spent two more days tweaking. Scraped the Bassguy and AC30 presets. Spent ages tweaking the JTM and also created a Badger 30 which sounded better than any of the others. In fact in my music room the Badger 30 preset sounded good and almost the sound I was looking for. Soundchecked for a gig... again it sounded thin and artificial. Tweaked it following soundcheck based on what I heard and didn't like during soundcheck. Used it for the gig. Still missing something.
Is this device always going to sound thin and somewhat artificial? There is something lacking. Warmth? Dynamics? I don't know. Is a tube power amp with amp sims disabled the answer? I have tried FRFR which sounds even more artificial to me in a live setting. Am I missing something? I play 80s, 90s rock/pop covers on a Fender Strat, Les Paul and Bill Lawrence Tele. Whilst the Axe FX certainly provides the versatility I've been yearning for I just cannot get a truly realistic sound out of it. Maybe I'm trying to achieve something that's not possible, but given the hype and reviews I thought this device was going to be the answer I've been looking for.
I'm looking for and am interested in others' views and thoughts.
Help!
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Update...
Thanks for all the responses and assistance. I've did try FRFR using the passive Atomic CLR/Matrix GT1000. Don't go through FOH at smaller gigs, which is one of the reasons I went for the Matrix option. I A/B'd FRFR (with cab sims) vs Guitar Cab (without) and found I got a better and more realistic sound with the later. Have spent today trying to get my rig to sound more 'realistic' without that 'digital' sound I keep hearing. After hours and hours it still sounds somewhat artificial to me. (NB: I did set my presets at gig type volume with backing tracks and as mentioned above re-checked at rehearsals and soundcheck.) Something's just not working for me.
Here are the presets I used. Very straight forward. Rhythm sounds on Scenes 1 & 2, lead sounds on Scenes 4 & 5.
Any more thoughts?
Attachments
Last edited: