I think the original question was why so much emphasis on high end/quality, rather than just FRFR in general.
The original question was framed in a way to create a stir rather than any real discussion. You'll notice a trend soon.
I ran exclusively through the PA and then fed back into the floor monitors for quite a while. The reason I got the wedges was so not to have to rely on someone else to allow me to hear my rig... Like the sound guy who forgot to pipe my guitar into the monitors... Also, a stereo guitar wedge setup is a glorious beast.... ;-)
What trend Scott?
Are you trying to stir some crap up .... again?
If you have an issue we can take this offline.
But I will call your BS nonsense every time I see it.
so keep posting your BS and I will call you every time on it.
This is not the Gear Page where you can silence someone that actually challenges you or posts something you disagree with or god forbid, openly states that he does not like one of the products "you" personally endorse.
If you are having a "Global Moderator" crisis --- I am right here pal.
You know what ... why don't I help you get it out of your system -- why don't I copy this post and put it on the Gear Page -- so you can get your kicks and give me an infraction --- LOL
Seriously dude-- get a life or at least a wife for a night -- sounds like you need it.
I think you have somewhat just answered your question here :lol. The obsession that most of us have with FRFR solutions in relation to the Axe is so one can hear an accurate representation of not only what's been modeled by the Axe but any other full range signal you put through it with out any compromise.
To further add because the Axe can be so much more than just a traditional guitar rig, synth block, Bass amp sims the amplification and/or speaker system needs to up to the task. To get one that does this without adding or subtracting to the end result at a reasonable price is the gole. So an obsession? maybe but I think a better word to describe it would be a journey. Because once you find what you need you really don't need to look any further... unless of course you just like to spend money :mrgreen.
The original question was framed in a way to create a stir rather than any real discussion. You'll notice a trend soon.
Not called for means uncalled for? English is not my native, so i'm asking seriously here... If not i have to refrase my post...
Edit: i think you copied my post before i took out some words that made it all wrong. Please read my edited post...
I think the original question was why so much emphasis on high end/quality, rather than just FRFR in general.
So that you can monitor what you're sending to the PA. "Expensive" isn't required, but more accurate is more better and that's often accompanied by more $$.If the Axe is most often used FOH or plugged into your PA (live) -- then why do you need an expensive FRFR speaker if you intend to use the Axe live and not in a studio or home setting?
That's not true... you yourself will hear it, as will your bandmates. And, unless the stage is just that big, so will anyone in the first few rows in front of you.Unless you are using the FRFR speaker as you source of amplification at a gig -- nobody is going to hear it.
"Cheaper" depends entirely on what gear you're talking about. As for "better"... Not really, but it might not be worse than your other options. PA speakers can have up to 5 3/4 metric crap-tons of processing on them that the box you'd be using wouldn't have, which means they won't necessarily sound the same. So as far as comparing your tone coming out of the speaker on-stage with what's coming out of the PA is concerned, you'd essentially just be using a randomish speaker.Wouldn't be better (and cheaper) -- just to either plug into your PA or one of your PA speakers to dial in your Axe?
If the Axe is most often used FOH or plugged into your PA (live) -- then why do you need an expensive FRFR speaker if you intend to use the Axe live and not in a studio or home setting?
Unless you are using the FRFR speaker as you source of amplification at a gig -- nobody is going to hear it.
Wouldn't be better (and cheaper) -- just to either plug into your PA or one of your PA speakers to dial in your Axe?
Just wondering folks that is all.
So that you can monitor what you're sending to the PA. "Expensive" isn't required, but more accurate is more better and that's often accompanied by more $$.
That's not true... you yourself will hear it, as will your bandmates. And, unless the stage is just that big, so will anyone in the first few rows in front of you.
"Cheaper" depends entirely on what gear you're talking about. As for "better"... Not really, but it might not be worse than your other options. PA speakers can have up to 5 3/4 metric crap-tons of processing on them that the box you'd be using wouldn't have, which means they won't necessarily sound the same. So as far as comparing your tone coming out of the speaker on-stage with what's coming out of the PA is concerned, you'd essentially just be using a randomish speaker.
The question for the novice when is enough enough? How deep do they need to go into their pockets to cover the basics
I have not done it yet -- but I am going to plug one of our PA speakers into the rig and see what happens. Actually run a separate cable and run both my current FRFR box and a PA speaker side by side. That might be a good exercise --
I think too much focus is spent on high end solutions and very little (if any) on budget friendly solutions that a person can use to make music with the Axe for himself and an audience.