@rickster71:
at first the CDC said that the coronavirus cant be air bourn and now they said it is. just like Ebola back in the 80's when they found out from dead monkeys that ebola was air bourn.
Borne, my friend; borne.
And, it's the "swine flu," not "swing." Gotta catch those typos, or people will think you're a Nigerian prince with a frozen bank account!
Still not seeing the relevance. And please differentiate between "aerosol," "airborne," "droplets," etc.
As for "shut the economy down": Nope, they didn't, and that reaction has been partially vindicated and partially shown to have been an overreaction. In defense of the overreaction part: The early estimates of lethality-per-infection were ridiculously high, which, had they been accurate, would indeed have justified everyone getting their sphincters in a pucker for weeks-on-end. (I mean, we're talking about mass graves and
Night of the Comet stuff.) But, as it happened, that bit of data (like so much coming from our "public experts" in Q1 this year) was way, way wrong.
I don't think you've directly responded to the point I made earlier: The patent page is irrelevant. Wrong virus. Seems to me that, to maintain credibility, you should fess up before you move on. Those who don't look less like
serious contributors and start looking a wee bit troll-ish.