Struggling with boomy bass and harsh mids

Do you ever play with phones? It’s good to have a reference that has a flat response. If you’re making big adjustments to your speakers you won’t know where you’re at frequency wise. If playing only at home it doesn’t matter too much but if you play out on another system or speakers then your presets won’t sound the same. If recorded music sounds normal on your setup then you’re probably ok though. Glad to hear you’re making progress.
I do have phones but i don't like them or trust them - changes the sound too drastically!
 
One thing that has helped me remove the characteristic Fractal sound of boominess and blanket over the speaker sound with the FM3 is to turn the Speaker Compliance and Speaker Thump parameters to zero in the Speaker data window of the amp block.
Ah well I'll try this because i do still have an issue there. I reckon a lot of the boominess is coming from the speaker placement in the room, but I might be able to help trim that on the amp settings somewhat
 
Perhaps getting the same amp, in the same room, at he EXACT same vi olume and see what you come up with.
I agree with Unix Guy, those videos are made to SELL PEODUCTS.
EX: As much as I love lari basilio I doubt the Laney amp she uses would sound the same in my room with her playing-the talent would be there but the same sound, uh nope!
I've watched lots of demos of the silver Jubilee and they're not all tricked up, it's just a good sounding amp.
I would love to get one in the room to try out a comparison but it's not really practical unfortunately. I would love to own one in fact, but I'll settle for my FM3 just sounding more like the real amp - which it is getting there
 
This is something that Fractal has proven, by showing traces of the original unit they're modeling and the model of it they created. They're spot-on. There's no characteristic sound, because they've modeled many different amps and they can be proven to be accurate. I'd like to see any other company do the same.

https://wiki.fractalaudio.com/wiki/index.php?title=Amp_block has a lot of information that's worth reading.
Is that why all these amp modeling companies like Fractal keep doing software updates on the amp model algorithms? Seems like that alone implies they are not spot on due to characteristics of the modeled sounds. Appears precision not accuracy is what is being modeled.
 
Continuous improvement is not a sign of low quality.
Where did I ever mention low quality? Anything in software relegates to continuous improvement hence why modeling has foreign characteristics in the sounds from the company modeling it, alluding to inaccurate details but rather precise details of those characteristics of the modeling. Has nothing to do with a sign of quality.
 
Last edited:
I do have phones but i don't like them or trust them - changes the sound too drastically!
If your phones change the sound drastically compared to your speakers then one or both are not flat. With decent phones and monitors they should be similar. They won’t be identical but drastically different is not good. FRFR is harsh compared to a real amp and guitar speakers. Some users use power amps into guitar cabs for that reason. We have a lot of eq options so you should be able to get there. Sounds like you’re making progress. Best luck man!
 
Is that why all these amp modeling companies like Fractal keep doing software updates on the amp model algorithms? Seems like that alone implies they are not spot on due to characteristics of the modeled sounds. Appears precision not accuracy is what is being modeled.
Because modeling an analog system digitally is extremely difficult; it’s recreating the actions of electrons moving through an electrical circuit using mathematics and the precision put into it leads to further accuracy.

Cliff is constantly fine tuning and improving. He’s well within a dB’s difference when he shows graphs, which we can’t hear, but wants more than that, so he finds something that isn’t just quite right, and improves it. He’s even said that some changes led to the sound being less musical or pretty but that was acceptable because the sound was even more accurate.

Every aspect of the modeler, including the effects and controls and underlying processes, are part of the firmware. The updates don’t necessarily involve a change to amps or cabs or even the sound, they sometimes are underlying processes but they still improve the unit’s performance and because Fractal is driven by quality and accuracy they release the update. Updates don’t imply massive changes they just imply improvement.

I do have phones but i don't like them or trust them - changes the sound too drastically!
Then I’d look critically at the quality of those phones. Good quality phones should be very close to the sound of good quality speakers.

What WILL change is the affect that physics have on the sound of the guitar. A speaker and the guitar couple acoustically and, as the volume increases, that feedback loop makes the guitar’s sound change. Gain increases and mids are emphasized. That doesn’t happen with headphones, especially closed-back headphones.

Also, when wearing headphones people tend to have the volume lower but that messes with our ability to hear the lows and highs.

There needs to be a step where the headphones come off, and/or the speakers get turned up loud, so we can hear the real sound at the final volume once physics has its way with the guitar.
 
Because modeling an analog system digitally is extremely difficult; it’s recreating the actions of electrons moving through an electrical circuit using mathematics and the precision put into it leads to further accuracy.

Cliff is constantly fine tuning and improving. He’s well within a dB’s difference when he shows graphs, which we can’t hear, but wants more than that, so he finds something that isn’t just quite right, and improves it. He’s even said that some changes led to the sound being less musical or pretty but that was acceptable because the sound was even more accurate.

Every aspect of the modeler, including the effects and controls and underlying processes, are part of the firmware. The updates don’t necessarily involve a change to amps or cabs or even the sound, they sometimes are underlying processes but they still improve the unit’s performance and because Fractal is driven by quality and accuracy they release the update. Updates don’t imply massive changes they just imply improvement.


Then I’d look critically at the quality of those phones. Good quality phones should be very close to the sound of good quality speakers.

What WILL change is the affect that physics have on the sound of the guitar. A speaker and the guitar couple acoustically and, as the volume increases, that feedback loop makes the guitar’s sound change. Gain increases and mids are emphasized. That doesn’t happen with headphones, especially closed-back headphones.

Also, when wearing headphones people tend to have the volume lower but that messes with our ability to hear the lows and highs.

There needs to be a step where the headphones come off, and/or the speakers get turned up loud, so we can hear the real sound at the final volume once physics has its way with the guitar.
This just is a reiteration of what I am saying: Precison leading to further accuracy through modeling software improvement, which is the principle of precision vs accuracy in scientific deviation, where complete accuracy is almost never achieved in a replicated system. Therefore a characteristic imprint of deviation exists. What I don't understand and find amusingly mind-boggling is this fanatical consumer product cult of personality mindset involved that leads to getting religiously defensive when a product is critiqued.
 
Last edited:
This just is a reiteration of what I am saying: Precison leading to further accuracy through modeling software improvement, which is the principle of precision vs accuracy in scientific deviation, where complete accuracy is almost never achieved in a replicated system. Therefore a characteristic imprint of deviation exists. What I don't understand and find amusingly mind-boggling is this fanatical consumer product cult of personality mindset involved that leads to getting religiously defensive when a product is critiqued.
There is no cult of personality mindset when people respond to your declaration of the "characteristic" Fractal sound. You're allowed to voice your opinion and others are allowed to respond in kind. Let's relax and play some guitar! There have been some awesome suggestions to the OP's question in this thread.
 
There is no cult of personality mindset when people respond to your declaration of the "characteristic" Fractal sound. You're allowed to voice your opinion and others are allowed to respond in kind. Let's relax and play some guitar! There have been some awesome suggestions to the OP's question in this thread.
There is a characteristic sound due to precision vs accuracy in modeling deviation in systems. It's not an opinion. https://www.researchgate.net/profil...ools-for-Validating-Reaction-Time-Stimuli.pdf
 
Last edited:
These conversations always end like this. That is sad imho. Unix guys answer was and is the answer-Youtube videos are to sell products.
I watched/listened to over 10 YT vids of guys comparing (playing) Martin OM28e to many taylors. I bought the MArtin. No my martindid not and does NOT sound like any of the videos I watched.

I truly believe because we are talking Modelers vs Amps...The amp will almost always win in THESE TYPES OF TALKS mainly because of this inherent idea that, well the amp is real and the other just mimics the amp. So the amp must have something that the other doesn't.
I have been playing for over 45 years. I have long ago gotten rid of this misconception.
It's OK for a great player like Jeff Golub to say he goes to a gig and uses whatever amp they have a available, although I believe A twin with a rat pedal were his preference-he played for the music and it was always great!
I am not saying things shouldn't sound they way you want, but jeeezzz, it's a guitar.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what it is doing in the digital model realm, would have to ask Fractal modeling personnel for an exact answer. Suppose to emulate speaker reactance per literature and reactance is inversely proportional to frequency. It is set to 50% as a stock setting, turning it down appears to take the blanket over speaker sound away that I hear. That was what I was mentioning as characteristic of the Fractal amp modeling due to that stock setting.
So I tried this tweak and yes it works.
My mahogany telecaster is a bit boomy and lower that settings really helps!

Thanxs
 
Sorry, I gotta unfollow this. Started out helping the OP.... now it's about amp modeling. Peace.
Talking about amp modeling in a thread in a forum about an amp modeler is unbelievable! How dare we speak about amp modeling pertaining to getting tones from an amp modeler!:eek:;)
 
One thing to note about the Yamaha monitor line (I have the HS50's) is that they are all rear ported. If you are close to a wall things can get boomy. The 50's have next to no response below 100, so I've never had an issue with low end on these.

The whole Yamaha line (except the HS8's) is pretty light in the low end. I think there is a tendency to boost low end on these which can cause things to get boomy outside of highly produced/polished content. I was guilty of this for a while and did a low end boost which wasn't translating well for my mixes.

How do you have the rear controls set? Maybe try messing with the room control to try cleaning things up. At first it might sound like low end is missing but give it a few days and you will start to appreciate the "tightness/clarity" of the low end content. I did anyway.

Regardless there are many many variables at play here.

EDIT: I've swapped back and forth between XLR and 1/4 inputs on these dozens of times over the years and didn't notice any audible differences.
I've got maximum cut on the room controls on the back of the speakers, that's minus 4db on the bass, and whatever it is on the highs. It's an improvement but these speakers are still a bit boomy in my room at least.

Are the 50s also rear ported? You reckon they would be less boomy than the HS7s? I might have to look at changing these in the long term
 
If your phones change the sound drastically compared to your speakers then one or both are not flat. With decent phones and monitors they should be similar. They won’t be identical but drastically different is not good. FRFR is harsh compared to a real amp and guitar speakers. Some users use power amps into guitar cabs for that reason. We have a lot of eq options so you should be able to get there. Sounds like you’re making progress. Best luck man!
Yeah they're cheap phones. I'm not worried about that, I don't use them often. There's no bookings on the headphones it's more of a digital processed tight sound. The speakers sound more like a real amp.

What I will say though is that if I copy the real amp settings from the video, it kind of sounds similar to a point, but not in the low end. He's got the bass turned right up. If I do that it's just mud, I can only get to 12 noon on my tone. If I lower that, it sounds more like the video because I'm getting better definition in the crunch.

I'm going to try all of the suggestions in this thread today and see what I can discover. I am convinced though, that combination of small room and these speakers, is what's strangling the low end for me. If I could get it so the low end is there but there's no boom, it's tight and defined, and I can still Palm mute, that's the goal
 
I've watched too many real amp demos lately and been impressed with how rounded the tones are. What I mean by that
is they seem to produce a natural high gain tone without boomy muddy lows and harsh trebly highs, it sounds good everywhere on the neck.

I want my high gain tones to sound like that but most times I end up with quite boomy low end and harsh treble in the mids, and when I adjust for this, it just seems to suck what life there was in the tone, out to the point of ending up with a flat lifeless, sometimes wiry tone. I know, we've discussed the high and low cuts in the cab block to death on here, I've done all that. I've tried a 10 band EQ, which I find if you start reducing low end frequencies, it make the tone very light sounding, lacking thickness. I've tried the parametric EQ, but it all results in the same thing, in that when I start making alterations it does reduce highs and lows but the tone is dull.

I've got my FM 3 on a USB cable in to my laptop, running FM3 edit. FM3 is running 1/4" cables to two HS7 FRFR monitors, so nothing unusual.
I know we've discussed tones fitting in the mix on here a lot, and I understand all of that, isolated guitar tracks not sounding as huge as you perceive them on a record and so forth - but they still sound lively with dynamics whereas mine sound more anaemic.

Have I just hit the limit of digital modelers or is there anything else I can try?
if it's any help, i can also make a real amp sound boomy and harsh through a loadbox and IRs as well =)

haven't read all the comments through here just yet, but somethings to bear in mind if it's any help

-your listening environment, as an example i have a small room and a huge desk where the computer/studio monitors sit, there's a huge resonance in the room around the 128hz mark to be more precise, this makes more a lot of boomy sounds around that level, IF i didn't have some EQ correction on my speakers/setup

by this I mean if you're aware of what the room is doing to sounds that you're hearing you can to some extent EQ things (i'd suggest even the global EQ for this as you can turn this on /off at will)

-'softening' the mids, more often than not it's the mids/treble that are causing that harsh sound to our hears , but any big peaks in those areas will sound harsher , and adding more low cuts/high cuts might ultimately end up further increasing that more than anything else, there are certainly Cabs/IRs that will either further accentuate or not as well, e.g try v30 cab vs a greenback cab etc..

-try one of two things for the low mids , a multiband compressor block works wonders i think for heavier tones setup with the 'andy sneap' trick, or compressing the lower mids , Or otherwise in say the Global EQ lower 125-250 area to hear how that sounds in your setup

-look at cutting before boosting to see how things balance out, the sound will change depending on the volume in the environment

-a low cut before the amp might be something to try, either through a filter block (low cut) or you can also try the Input EQ , to push the cut up to say 120hz to try

i have a feeling it's more a case of EQing to your room than the initial sound being harsh/anaemic, lower mids can make stuff sound boomy very quick

the reason i'm saying to try the global EQ is that if you go out and play, if you have a global EQ that is matched to your setup at home, you don't really want that in a live space that has no resemblance to your home setup
 
Yeah they're cheap phones. I'm not worried about that, I don't use them often. There's no bookings on the headphones it's more of a digital processed tight sound. The speakers sound more like a real amp.

What I will say though is that if I copy the real amp settings from the video, it kind of sounds similar to a point, but not in the low end. He's got the bass turned right up. If I do that it's just mud, I can only get to 12 noon on my tone. If I lower that, it sounds more like the video because I'm getting better definition in the crunch.

I'm going to try all of the suggestions in this thread today and see what I can discover. I am convinced though, that combination of small room and these speakers, is what's strangling the low end for me. If I could get it so the low end is there but there's no boom, it's tight and defined, and I can still Palm mute, that's the goal

Do you have the same issue with multiple guitars? Don’t know if you mentioned that. I have issues with harsh high end sometimes but lows shouldn’t be hard to fix. So maybe it is just your speakers and or room. Or both. Everything I do to fix lows has been suggested already. I tried the settings from the video on the Brit Silver and it sounded normal to me. You said your phones are cheap but does the bottom sound better on them? Also gotta ask if you’ve tried other guitar cables?
 
Back
Top Bottom