michaiel
Member
The real easy way to judge this is to record both a wet and dry track at the same time, reamp it and then compare the two wet tracks. Do this in both analog and digital and I guarantee that the two tracks in digital will be indistinguishable. To me that equates to better.
Of course this is just my perspective, how your workflow is doesn't matter to me and how you get the job done is your business. I spent a lot of time trying to get beyond the 48kHz restriction and finally gave in because it was better.
You are right the two tracks will be almost indistinguishable.
There are only 2 reasons for recording at 96kHz
Lowest possible buffer setting for tracking
Mixing with time based effects
Again...
"I spelled out instructions on how to do this to help other Pro Tools members...I will apply it in practice this weekend...I merely was asking if anyone sees why this will or will not work..."