Dave Merrill
Axe-Master
I stand corrected about CPU, but it does still have to read the whole preset into memory when it loads.It's been stated above that this is not the case.
I stand corrected about CPU, but it does still have to read the whole preset into memory when it loads.It's been stated above that this is not the case.
I don't think they are...I think the limitation is that all channels used in a preset are actually loaded and initialized when you load the preset. More channels would increase loading time and CPU usage.
I think.
Other than that I have the same wish.
In NVRAM on the unit. Double the preset size means half the number of presets possible to be stored...Well really, it would double at most.
On disk, who cares?
In operation, see the guess in my previous post.
If the number of channels makes a measurable difference in preset load time, that’s all the more reason to only save/restore channels that are in use, regardless of whether the number of channels is increased.More channels might also increase the load time for presets as well. More data to load into RAM. Nothing's free.