tempus fugit
Inspired
My primary use will be for recording.
But ....I would like to use the Axe FX II in 4 Cable Method from time to time live.
I won't be using an MFC101 and I'm not concerned about ethercon etc.
From my various web searches it appears that there is no difference between Mark I and Mark II with regard to the amp modeling and sonic qualities.
But for some reason I thought I'd heard or read that Mark I's do not have as good a signal to noise ratio in the 4 Cable method. Probably complete nonsense.
I'm just confirming if there are any caveats to consider before buying a Mark I.
Thank you.
But ....I would like to use the Axe FX II in 4 Cable Method from time to time live.
I won't be using an MFC101 and I'm not concerned about ethercon etc.
From my various web searches it appears that there is no difference between Mark I and Mark II with regard to the amp modeling and sonic qualities.
But for some reason I thought I'd heard or read that Mark I's do not have as good a signal to noise ratio in the 4 Cable method. Probably complete nonsense.
I'm just confirming if there are any caveats to consider before buying a Mark I.
Thank you.
