How do you plan to use gapless switching?

I never change presets during a song, so this doesn't represent any significant change on my life
Emily Osment Nothing GIF by CBS

Don't you change scenes and/or channels within a preset/song? If so, gapless scene and channel switching would benefit you even if you could care less about gapless preset changes.
 
its a fantastic update....if it was combined with the song/setlist function having tempo information as well.....that would make it even better...not sure if this is possible. would open up even more possibilities if it was
 
  • Like
Reactions: rog
I don't necessarily agree with that. I'd rather maintain 1 preset using 8 scenes for variations than maintain 8 presets.

However, I absolutely think it will change my workflow and that of many others.

I'll probably rely more on presets to get more variations than trying to stuff everything into kitchen sink presets.
I'd also rather maintain one preset as well just for the sake of consistency during live performances. I generally want to have one core amp tone that I manipulate with other blocks rather than bouncing between wildly different tones.
 
My scene changes were already gapless
My scene changes are gapless too but because I don't change amp channels between scenes. However, there are times where I essentially wish I had more than 8 scenes in a preset. I'm hoping that the new gapless switching would allow me to use another preset for "overflow" scenes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rog
Before, scenes were the gapless alternative to presets (under certain conditions). But now since everything is gapless, the main benefit of using scenes over presets is largely gone.
Is it though? You want to dial in and maintain, say... the exact same amp, drive, and cab settings across 3 presets just so you can add a compressor, turn off a delay, and switch a pitch shifter between two channels?
 
For gigging, unless the song requires specialist sounds I'm currently using a kitchen sink preset with scene ignore for amps and mixture of scene controllers, control switches, dual amp and drive blocks and multiplexer blocks to keep my scene changes seamless, so it will be nice to be able to do away with the blocks and modifiers I need to do that, which in turn will free up CPU, although I'm not sure that will be as much of a consideration anymore if 1 amp and 1 drive block is going to be enough?

I've never used song/setlists because I wanted to avoid gaps, so I'm also looking forward to experimenting with that. Having never tried it I don't know how well preset spillover works to keep changes with effects smooth? I guess it depends on how radical the audio changes are, but here's what I'm thinking:

Create a preset each for clean, edge of breakup, crunch and lead tones each with 8 scenes for the sounds/effect combos I'll mostly ever need. I'll then use songs/setlists to select the appropriate tones from those presets for each song and to switch between them at gigs. That way I only have to maintain 4 presets and can enjoy seamless switching between my favourite sounds in every song. If a particular song has specific effects/settings (like Livin On A Prayer with the talkbox) then I'll continue to have a song per preset for those songs, but in our current setlist of around 30 songs, I only need dedicate presets for a handful of them.

Of all the updates in the years I've been using Fractal products this is one of the ones I'm most excited to try and am really hoping it successfully makes it to the FM9 as I only recently sold my 3!
 
Last edited:
Just using my fm3 now so gapless is going to be great. It Would allow me take the 1-2 blocks which I can't fit in my kitchen sink patch and just make a second preset with the same core sounds and scenes, adding those one or two missing blocks. Mainly clean based modulation. So chorus or rotary. When needed I'll go to that preset and back to my main patch w no gap. Same with allowing me to not really need drive blocks and just rolling with different amp channels which will save cpu there as well. No brainer and It's pretty great. Hoping it comes to the fm series sooner then later.
 
When I currently use 2 amp blocks, each block has the same 4 amps in it's four channels. From there it's about having the 2 amp channels I want instant access to within any given scene. If the gapless switching delivers as I hope, I'll be trying to run 8 different amps amongst the 8 available channels, along with anything else it'll let me get away with. We shall see.
 
In a lot of presets I end up with at least a couple of delays, one short or doubling delay and one longer for leads. At the moment I just add an extra block to avoid gaps and usually run one in series and one in parallel. I'll also probably stop using two amp blocks. I'd see both of these changes more for simplicity in creating presets rather than saving CPU as I'm pretty much never at a point where I'm CPU limited. It's going to be great.

Congratulations to Fractal for bringing one of the most requested features to the Axe Fx 3 and thanks in advance for bringing this to the FM9 😀. My hope for the next feature is adding meta data, i.e. a comment field for a preset (and ideally labels for channels) so I can make a note what's what when I come back 2 years later to my Flock of Seagulls preset for I Ran. That'll probably have to next generation products though as that would change the preset format, and you never know 😀.
 
Currently, I rarely use different channels on a block because of the gap. Probably will be using channels on the drives more often but will have to see if channel switching on delay/reverb has tails.
 
I have been using two amp blocks into 1 cab. The first amp block is a Vibroverb. I use it for the clean tone and sometimes add a pedal like a RC boost for a little dirt. I'll use a scene controller attached to the Gain, Bright and Mid Boost and treble control to get a non pedal dirt tone from the amp which I could also stack a pedal on if I wanted. Its like having a channel switching vintage fender. The the second amp block is the Brit silver which I feel goes really nice with the vibroverb. So Its like having a 3 channel amp. The Tones between gain stacks is pretty much in family. I suppose gapless switching will enable me to ditch the second amp block. I feel like it wont solve delay channel changes if the delay time is different due to the weird thing that you hear when using scenes to switch delay. Its like when you turn you delay time knob live it makes a weird sound so I will still be just turning 1 off and 2 on. Reverb blocks may be cool using gapless switching. I usually don't hear much when I switch to a different reverb maybe for special effect. I think it will be nice because that pop I hear on some blocks will now go away. It will enable cpu savings for having to use multiple blocks on some things. Its a valuable improvement if it happens for fm9 and 3.
 
Any idea why lots of people are talking about them these days? ;)

Because the latest firmware release on the Axe-FX III includes gapless switching for Channels and Scenes (as well as presets which we already have). Additionally, Cliff speculated that it might be possible to implement this on the FM9. No guarantees! Read back through the thread below and you will get more context.
https://forum.fractalaudio.com/threads/gapless-switching-may-be-coming-to-fm9.198511/
 
Because the latest firmware release on the Axe-FX III includes gapless switching for Channels and Scenes (as well as presets which we already have). Additionally, Cliff speculated that it might be possible to implement this on the FM9. No guarantees! Read back through the thread below and you will get more context.
https://forum.fractalaudio.com/threads/gapless-switching-may-be-coming-to-fm9.198511/
Yes I'm aware, seemed like the poster I was replying to might not have known about that, I was just goofin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rog
Back
Top Bottom