• We would like to remind our members that this is a privately owned, run and supported forum. You are here at the invitation and discretion of the owners. As such, rules and standards of conduct will be applied that help keep this forum functioning as the owners desire. These include, but are not limited to, removing content and even access to the forum.

    Please give yourself a refresher on the forum rules you agreed to follow when you signed up.

Fractal Audio and the future of... cabinet sims?

speedloader

Inspired
@Soultrash Speaking of that, I came up with a simple trick to get rid of the issue with the spacialization of IRs, blending front generic IRs with some far-field back mics from Two Notes, which add in-the-room dimension to the mids (and a bit of comb effect), and can be overloaded and excited to add density to the top end. You can manipulate it to get some dense hissy, thumpy tone with a strong room effect that doesn't disturb the balance of the front IR. It still asks for a bit a search to pan it right, but it's an improvement imho. It kind of restores what the IRs lack. You can ear it there , part 4 is the front mic alone, and part 5 is the back mic, then both at once. The egnater sample also gives a better idea of what it does to hard-panned guitars.

--

@sam I considered it and assume the tone of my answer. When somebody quotes another and answers at the 2nd person, it logically heads for that other person. I am thankful for everyone who gives their opinion on the topic - even those who threaten to boycott my topics - because that's what I asked for and you are all customers with a valuable opinion on Cliff's products. However I am not a product of Fractal Audio myself so opinions about me and my understanding of the product are uncalled for, unless I say something that might mislead another, which I didn't. Hence for a customer to patronize me about my understanding for no reason, assuming their authority on the subject, is plainly insulting and unacceptable.
 

Hubi

Experienced
Maybe a good compromise would be more editing tools in the cab block. Being able to get close with an IR, then get the rest of the way adjusting notches, etc

A good IR is a good IR and doesn´t need to be edited........think of Tyler Ground, his great SRV-Sounds and his fu......ing simple free IR´s......

@danny - I´m absolutely with you - and it´s alwas a good feeling to delete a few IR´s in the Axe, which I don´t need - and to use only a few Favourites. This is my experience after buying many cabpacks. Most of them I use are single Mic IR´s - raw, direct.
 

Tahoebrian5

Fractal Fanatic
A good IR is a good IR and doesn´t need to be edited........think of Tyler Ground, his great SRV-Sounds and his fu......ing simple free IR´s......

@danny - I´m absolutely with you - and it´s alwas a good feeling to delete a few IR´s in the Axe, which I don´t need - and to use only a few Favourites. This is my experience after buying many cabpacks. Most of them I use are single Mic IR´s - raw, direct.

It's not a question of good or bad, but rather is it the tone you are searching for. I feel like I have to get lucky to find the perfect ir. If there were more editing tools, close would be good enough and you could tweak from there.
 
S

Soultrash

Guest
@BillyZeppa
i am actually not that much after the "amp in the room sound"
when i turn up the room parameter in the cab block to a fairly high level
i am basically somewhere there. the problem with this is, that the room
kind of smears the sound, it takes away a good portion of the attack/definition,
where mic'd cabs sound very "3D" without being smeared...if this makes any sense...

@The Last Romantic
:)

@GM Arts
yeah, browsing thousands of IR's totally kills the workflow and creativity.
something that is more dynamic and intuitive would be great, like a completely algorithmic
cab simulation where you can determine the room, the cab, the speakers, the mic etc.
without any limitations in positioning, distance etcc. oh that would be great...

@DLC86
totally fresh news for me, can you point out a source please! :)

@Tahoebrian5
absolutely. i'd love being able to "fix" the amout of room to certain frequencies for example

@speedloader
good approach, i have tried this myself but got not so great results.
playing with the room parameter in the cab block can help but i think
that it needs a few more things that can be tweaked. i'd basically need
a parameter that let's me determine which frequencies are affected
by the room and which frequencies are not processed.
 

speedloader

Inspired
@DLC86 That sounds promising, a true cab simulator in its own separate unit that can be controlled via ax-fx/ax8/fx8 would be on top of my gear list. That LB-1 seems to also have the potential to solve the resonance matching issues with non-tube amps, I guess. I just hope the cab sim part isn't just another IR loader. Can't wait to hear more!
 
Top Bottom