Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We would like to remind our members that this is a privately owned, run and supported forum. You are here at the invitation and discretion of the owners. As such, rules and standards of conduct will be applied that help keep this forum functioning as the owners desire. These include, but are not limited to, removing content and even access to the forum.
So the 64 sample bug was reduced by 32 samples, meaning there are still another 32 occurring? The FM9 is essentially adding the latency equivalent of a drive block for some reason. Weird.
I'm sure somebody will stomp on me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that both the FM3 and FM9 have an identical latency of 3.33ms while the Axe 3 has 1ms less.
So the 64 sample bug was reduced by 32 samples, meaning there are still another 32 occurring? The FM9 is essentially adding the latency equivalent of a drive block for some reason. Weird.
It could be that some internal buffering is required to take advantage of parallel processing on additional DSP cores that FM9 has. I can't think of a way to eliminate that completely.
I'm sure somebody will stomp on me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that both the FM3 and FM9 have an identical latency of 3.33ms while the Axe 3 has 1ms less.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
