ApocalypticKatana
Experienced
That’s a fair and good point since it’s the exact SIC for the corresponding IR being shot in the Dyna-cabok!, as in the numerous other threads on this same topic, this is my queue to speil...
nope - not just another way to search IRs - the automated speaker curve integration using ICs from the actual cabs makes DCs unique from the legacy process, and objectively better in terms of accuracy (as well as selection efficiency, and integration, as mentioned above). This automated and more accurate speaker curve integration is the groundbreaking aspect of DCs. And again, seems really weird to me that few if any here seem to acknowledge the importance of this new feature and/or state much credit to Fractal for belng the only one (at least to my knowledge of modelling products) to determime a way to do it, and offer it to customers (I am used to explosions of applause here for much less, but on this auto-IC aspect using real ICs taken from the actual captured cabs (raising the bar to a new level for amp/cab modelling imo), I've heard mostly crickets).
That’s a +1 to Dyna-Cab for amp-cab interaction modelling accuracy.
But saying that…
I do wonder if the SIC graph curves are smoothed out in the data or a near direct drop in.
I say that because we can adjust LF and HF Q and frequency for the SIC in the amp block which leads me to believe there is some sort of data curve smoothing happening.
Assuming the SIC data is smoothed from here on…
with that information is it really that much more accurate…
compared to when I use a 3rd party IR with the same cab-mic combo as the dyna-cab? (Same IR length compensated)